FIG. 7 in New material of the frog Hungarobatrachus szukacsi Szentesi & Venczel, 2010, from the Santonian of Hungary, supports its neobatrachian affinities and reveals a Gondwanan influence on the European Late Cretaceous anuran fauna
Bibliographic record
Abstract
FIG. 7. — Tentative skull reconstruction, in dorsal view, for Hungarobatrachus szukacsi Szentesi & Venczel, 2010. Photographs of the fused and anteriorly incomplete frontoparietals (MTM VER 2016.2546), the largest and one of the most nearly complete squamosals (MTM VER 2016.695, left squamosal), and the most nearly complete maxilla (MTM VER 2016.690, right maxilla) are overlain onto skull image of the Eocene anuran Thaumastosaurus gezei (modified from Laloy et al. 2013: fig. 3A). To improve symmetry, for the frontoparietals the intact portion from its left side was mirrored onto the right side and the left squamosal and right maxilla were mirrored onto the opposite sides of the skull. Dotted lines denote skull outline, inferred natural margins along broken surfaces for bones, and inferred contacts among bones. Although the posterior end of the maxilla is depicted as free, a shallow facet preserved on the dorsolingual surface of MTM VER 2016.690 indicates the maxilla posteriorly contacted the quadratojugal to form a closed 'cheek'. All fossil bones are depicted at their actual sizes relative to one another (i.e., they have not been arbitrarily re-sized in an attempt to improve proportions and contacts). Thaumastosaurus De Stefano, 1903 was chosen as the basis for our reconstruction, not because it is closely related (see our phylogenetic analysis and Fig. 8), but because its shape and proportions are a good fit for the available fossil bones of Hungarobatrachus. Abbreviations: fp, frontoparietals; max, maxilla; sq, squamosal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.056 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".