Scatopsciara (Xenopygina) fratercula Vilkamaa & Hippa 2006, comb. n.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Scatopsciara (Xenopygina) fratercula (Vilkamaa & Hippa, 2006) comb. n. (Fig. 12 D–F) Literature: Vilkamaa & Hippa (2006): 33, 37, figs 3 C–E, 4 B, 4 D, 4 E, 5 C, 6 D (as Corynoptera); Mohrig et al. (2013): 183– 184. Further material (not mentioned in Mohrig et al. (2013): 183–184): 2 males, 30.iv.–11.vi.1994, leg. E. Fuller, Canada, Alberta, Berland River at Hwy 40, 53.42°N, 118.20°W, pine forest, Malaise trap (PWMP); 1 male, 24.vii.1974, leg. P. H. Arnaud, USA, Oregon, Crook County, Cougar Camp ground, Marks Creek (CAS). Comments. The species is characterized by two spines with fused bases in the middle of the inner side of gonostylus and 6 spines on the apex. The inner ventral base of gonocoxites is lobe-like and haired rather long. The short lobes of the two spines at the inner side seem to be intermediate between other species of the paradoxa group and Sc. hastata as well as Sc. paradoxa, which have a long protuberance at inner side. Distribution. Canada (Alberta, British Colombia); USA (Alaska, Oregon).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".