MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931337644 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6236040

Typhlodromina conspicua Garman

2008· article· en· W6931337644 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicFuzzy Systems and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpermathecaDorsumShieldStab

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Typhlodromina conspicua (Garman) Iphidulus conpicuus Garman 1948: 14. Typhlodromus conspicuous, Nesbit 1951: 22; Muma 1955: 268; De Leon 1959: 125; Hirschmann 1962:17; Specht 1968: 674; Chant et al. 1974: 1270; Chant and Yoshida-Shaul 1983: 1044 –1045. Typhlodromus (Typhlodromus) conpicuus, Cunliffe and Baker 1953: 11; Chant 1959: 55. Typhlodromina conspicua, Muma 1961: 297; 1964: 37–38; De Leon 1967: 16; Muma and Denmark 1969: 407 –408; Zack 1969: 78; Denmark and Muma 1975: 298; Moraes et al. 2004: 304; Chant and McMurtry 2007: 169. FEMALE. (2 specimens measured) Dorsal shield 369 (363–375) long, 281 (278–285) wide; j1 29 (28–29), j3 37, j4 28 (26–29), j5 31 (30– 31), j6 35, J2 39, J5 9, (8–10), z2 22, z3 43 (41–44), z4 45 (44–45), z5 34 (33–34), Z4 70, Z5 67 (66–68), s4 53 (51–54), s6 59 (57–60), S5 50 (48–52), r3 24 (23–25), R1 16 (15–16); distances between ST1-ST3 59 (58– 61), ST2-ST2 64 (63–65) and ST5-ST5 73; ventrianal shield 114 (113–115) long, 76 (75–78) wide at level of ZV2 and 63 wide at level of anus; JV5 53 (52–54); movable cheliceral digit 29 (28–30) long, with 1 tooth; fixed cheliceral digit 24 (23–25) long, with 3 teeth; calyx of spermatheca 29 (28–30); Sge IV 29 (28–30), Sti IV 26, St IV 44 (43–44). Chaetotaxy: genu II - 2, 2/1, 2/0, 1 (in one female collected in this study, 2, 2/0, 2/0, 1 on one side); genu III - 1, 2/1, 2/0, 1. MALE. (1 specimen measured) Dorsal shield 245 long, 180 wide; j1 broken, j3 28, j4 19, j5 broken, j6 19, J2 broken, J5 5, z2 18, z3 30, z4 33, z5 broken, Z4 53, Z5 47, s4 34, s6 40, S5 28, r3 19, R1 10; setae smooth, except Z4 and Z5, lightly serrate; ventrianal shield subtriangular and reticulate 105 long, 144 wide at the anterior corners, with 5 pairs of preanal setae, 3 pairs of lyrifisures (respectively anterior and about in longitudinal line with JV1, posterolateral to ZV1 and between JV3 and ZV3), elliptical preanal pores posteromesad to JV2; sharp-tipped macrosetae; Sge IV 22, Sti IV 20, St IV 40; peritreme extending forward to level of j3. Specimens examined. Cajamarca: San Ignacio-Tomaque (5° 7' 35" S, 78° 58' 41" W), 4-VIII-2006, on Capsicum annum (4Ψ, 1%). Previous records. Canada, Cuba, Galapagos, Guatemala, Honduras, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Nicaragua, Puerto Rico, Trinidad, USA and Venezuela. Remarks. The females collected in this study agree with measurements of the holotype given by Chant and Yoshida-Shaul (1983).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.796
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it