MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931353458 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5744411

Plan de gestion des données de recherche: tour d'horizon

2021· article· fr· W6931353458 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlan (archaeology)Intervention (counseling)Government (linguistics)Work (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Présentation donnée par Emanuela Chiriac, bibliothécaire, aux professeurs du département des sciences infirmières de l'Université du Québec en Outaouais en mai 2021. Cette intervention s’inscrit dans une campagne d'information menée par la bibliothèque en regard de la Politique des trois organismes subventionnaires canadiens sur les données de recherche, adoptée en mars 2021.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.120
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.134
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Reproducibility · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score0.635

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1200.134
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.004
Bibliometrics0.0080.008
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0330.017
Open science0.0050.011
Research integrity0.0080.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0660.040

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.207
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.070 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainReproducibility
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionFrench-language works237,207