MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931363753 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3791003

Atheta annexa Casey 1910

2009· article· en· W6931363753 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicMind wandering and attention
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources CanadaCanadian Forest Service
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNational parkBark (sound)AlderBayDebrisFlood myth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Atheta annexa Casey, 1910 Fig 38, Map 38 Additional Records. CANADA, New Brunswick, Carleton Co., “Two Mile Brook Fen”, 46.3712°N, 67.6772°W, 4.VIII.2006 (1 ♀, RWC). Saint John Co., Fundy Trail Parkway, 45.3972°N, 65.4523°W, 23.VIII.2006 (1 ♁, RWC). Sunbury Co., Lakeville Corner, 45.9007°N, 66.2423°W, 27.VIII.2006 (1 ♁, RWC); Acadia Research Forest, 46.0188°N, 66.3765°W, 18.IX.2007 (1 ♁, AFC). York Co., Charters Settlement, 45.8395°N, 66.7391°W, 15.IV.2004, 3.V.2004, 21.VI.2004, 28.IX.2005 (2 ♁, 4 ♀, RWC); Charters Settlement, 45.8340°N, 66.7450°W, 30.IV.2005 (1 ♀, RWC); Charters Settlement, 45.8430°N, 66.7275°W, 8.X.2005 (1 ♁, RWC); Fred- Map 38. Collection localities in New Brunswick, Canada of Atheta annexa. ericton at Saint John River, 45.9588°N, 66.6254°W, 7.VI.2005 (1 ♀, RWC); 8.4 km W of Tracy off Rt. 645, 45.6821°N, 66.7894°W, 6.V.2008 (1 ♀, RWC). Bionomic Notes. In New Brunswick, A. annexa was found in gilled mushrooms, coral fungi on spruce log, fleshy polypore fungi at base of dead standing Populus sp., among decaying vegetables, under spruce bark in wood pile, and in flood debris along a river margin. Th is species was found in mixed forests, mature red spruce and yellow birch forests, mature red spruce and red maple forests, and in wet alder swamps. Elsewhere this species has been collected from various kinds of decaying organic debris including raccoon dung, decaying fungi, moldy corncobs and from nests of wood-rats, Neotoma sp. (Klimaszewski and Peck 1986, Majka and Klimaszewski 2008b). Adults in New Brunswick were collected in April, May, June, August, September and October. Collection method: sifting. Distribution in Canada and Alaska. ON, QC, NB, NS (Klimaszewski and Peck 1986; Gusarov 2003; Majka and Klimaszewski 2008b)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.139
Threshold uncertainty score0.277

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0710.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicMind wandering and attentionFrench-language works237,207