Bibliographic record
Abstract
Strigiphilus cursor (Burmeister, 1838) Docophorus cursor Burmeister, 1838: 426. Philopterus cursor Nitzsch, in Burmeister, 1838 [sic]; Harrison 1916: 92. Strigiphilus cursor (Burmeister, 1838); Hopkins & Clay 1952: 339. Strigiphilus cursor (Burmeister, 1838); Clay 1966b: 841, 843, fig. 15. Strigiphilus cursor (Burmeister, 1838); Price et al. 2003: 239. Strigiphilus cursor (Burmeister, 1838); González-Acuña et al. 2006b: 302. Strigiphilus cursor (Burmeister, 1838); Moreno & González-Acuña 2015: 96, fig. 9B. Strigiphilus cursor (Burmeister, 1838); González-Acuña & Moreno 2018: 262. Strigiphilus cursor (Burmeister, 1838); Shimada & Yoshizawa 2020: 504, figs 7–11. Philopterus cursor var laticephalus Uchida, 1949: 543; Shimada & Yoshizawa 2020: 505, figs 12–16 [in part]. Syntypes presumed lost (see Palma 2017: 28). Type host: Asio flammeus flammeus (Pontoppidan, 1763). Chilean host: Asio flammeus suinda (Vieillot, 1817). Other host: Strix aluco yamadae Yamashina, 1936. Chilean localities: La Ligua: Region V; Llolleo: Region V; Las Cabras (Cachapoal): Region VI; Carampangue: Region VIII; Malleco: Region IX; Temuco: Region IX; Chillán: Region XVI. Geographic distribution: North Africa; Eurasia; North and South America. Chilean references: González-Acuña et al. (2006b); Moreno & González-Acuña (2015); González-Acuña & Moreno (2018). Other significant references: Carriker (1966: 85); Clay (1966b); Price et al. (2003); Galloway & Lamb (2019: 610); Shimada & Yoshizawa (2020). Remarks: Galloway & Lamb (2019) provided ecological data on Strigiphilus cursor collected from Asio flammeus in Manitoba, Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".