Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neobisnius villosulus (Stephens, 1833) NEW BRUNSWICK: Carleton Co.: Bell Forest Nature Preserve, 46.2152 N, 67.7190 W, 1.VI.2005, M.-A. Giguere and R.P. Webster, upper river margin, collected while in flight on warm afternoon, (1, RWC); Two mile Brook Fen N of Lakeville, 46.3594 N, 67.6800 W, 2.VI.2005, R.P. Webster, near cedar swamp, in flight late afternoon, (1, RWC); York Co.: Charters Settlement, 45.8395 N, 66.7391 W, 1.VIII.2007, R.P. Webster, collected at M.V. light, (1, RWC); Keswick River at Rte 105, 45.9943 N, 66.8337 W, 18.VI.2004, R.P. Webster, silver maple forest under debris on muddy soil near small pool, (1, RWC). Majka and Klimaszewski (2008) reported this species in New Brunswick on the basis of a specimen collected in Hartland by R.P. Webster. This identification was in error and was based on a specimen of Stictolinus flavipes Donisthorpe. However, the above specimens collected by R.P. Webster establish the presence of N. villosulus in New Brunswick (Fig. 5). Th e earliest North American records are from 1860 in Québec (Bain 1999). It is widely distributed in Europe east to Russia, the Ukraine, and the Caucasus (Herman 2001; Smetana 2004b). It is found mainly in moist habitats including the margins of rivers, marshes, and lakes (Newton et al. 2000).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".