Pholcomma hirsutum Thorell 1869
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pholcomma hirsutum Thorell 1869 (Figs 69–73) Material examined.— Canada: Québec: Pontiac: Les Collinesdel’Outaouais, 2 km North of Eardley [45°34’N, 76°05’W] 20.viii.2004, sifting litter in maple forest, 4ɗ 4Ψ, P. Paquin & N. Dupérré (CPAD); Pontiac: Les Collinesdel’Outaouais, 2 km North of Eardley [45°34’N, 76°05’W] 20.viii.2004, sifting moss on rocks in maple forest, 1Ψ, P. Paquin & N. Dupérré (CPAD); Pontiac: Les Collinesdel’Outaouais, 2 km North of Eardley [45°34’N, 76°05’W] 20.viii.2004, sifting litter in oakmaple forest, 1Ψ, P. Paquin & N. Dupérré (CPAD); Kazabazua, La ValléedelaGatineau, Lac Danford [45°57’N, 76°08’W] 16.vi.2001, sifting litter (poplar/ Alnus), 1ɗ, P. Paquin & N. Dupérré (CPAD). Diagnosis.— The male of the species is recognised by an abdominal scutum covering whole dorsum, a palp with long thin embolus (E) (Fig. 71), and a curved conductor (C) (Fig. 71). Females are characterised by a pale abdomen lacking a dorsal scutum, an epigynum with a wellsclerotized posterior epigynal margin (PEM) (Fig. 72), complex copulatory ducts (CD), and oval spermathecae (S) (Fig. 73). Distribution.— Known from Québec (present records) and Wisconsin south to Florida and Mississippi (see Levi 1957b). Remark.— Kaston (1948) reported that P. hirsutum is associated with forest litter, which is supported by our collection data. The distribution of the species and the records from deciduous litter suggest that the species may reach its northern limit below the conifer and boreal forests of North America. This species is likely to be confused with a small Erigoninae (Linyphiidae).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.048 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".