MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931385357 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4776524

Region-specific brain organoids – a novel model to study Zika virus-induced neurodevelopmental disease and therapeutic testing

2020· article· en· W6931385357 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Thin Films
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrocephalyZika virusOrganoidContext (archaeology)Induced pluripotent stem cellPreclinical testingDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Therapeutic development and drug discovery processes are heavily challenged by delays in the preclinical experimental stages before being offered for Phase 1 clinical trials. Virtual Embryo-like approaches, stem cell technologies, and cutting-edge computational models offer promising future tools (Shafique, 2018) [Fig. 3]. ZV infection results in pathological/morphological changes in the developing brain (Shafique, 2018a) resulting in the birth defect of microcephaly with immense psychosocial impact (Shafique, 2017a). The brain organoids have multiple applications including investigating developmental biology modeling neurodevelopmental defects such as microcephaly (Lancaster et al., 2013) [Fig 1,2]. More specialized region-specific organoids of brain regions such as the forebrain organoid platform to model Zika virus (ZIKV) exposure have been developed (Qian et al., 2017) [Fig. 4,5]. This forebrain-focused organoid model is a renewable, easily available, and economically novel tool to evaluate and screen for therapeutic drugs, such as antiviral compounds, and determine their efficacy and safety for the phase 1 clinical trials. This poster is an overview encompassing the currently available options for preclinical developmental toxicity testing with a focus on the potential applications of 3D organoids in context with investigating Zika virus-related domains. These sustainable, accessible, and renewable tools could help the researchers to replace the use of animal models for the purposes of toxicity testing during the drug development process. References: Shafique, S. (2018). Preclinical developmental toxicity testing and advanced in-vitro stem cell-based systems. Timely Topics Clinical Vaccine Research, 2(1), 2–4.<br> Shafique, S. (2018a). Zika-Induced Microcephaly and Neurodevelopment. Res J Congenit Disease, 1(1), 1– 3. http://www.imedpub.com/ Shafique, S. (2017a). Pregnancy with Zika Virus-Psychosocial Impacts and High Risk for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Research Journal of Congenital Diseases, 1(1), 1–2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.875
Threshold uncertainty score0.803

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicFluid Dynamics and Thin FilmsFrench-language works237,207