THE SOCIAL REPRESENTATIONS OF THE JOURNALIST'S WORKING PRECARIOUSNESS: A STUDY WITH PROFESSIONALS FROM VALE DOS SINOS - RS - BRAZIL
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The scenario of the contemporary world of work has been undergoing significant transformations, not only with the Covid-19 pandemic, but certainly enhanced by it. In Rio Grande do Sul this number reached 41.1%. According to the Brazilian Institute of Economics and Statistics (IBGE), in the first quarter of 2022, the rate of informality in the labor market reached 40.4% of the employed population in Brazil. In Rio Grande do Sul this number reached 41.1%. In this way, it reached more than 38 million people. In comparison with the same quarter of 2021, almost 3 million formal jobs were created in the private sector; almost 3 million formal jobs were created in the private sector. This study is structured from the theoretical assumptions of the categories of work and precarious work, work and the theory of social representations. The objective of this text is to understand the social representations about work created and experienced by freelance journalists who work in informal and precarious situations in Vale do Rio dos Sinos - RS. The methodological procedures adopted to carry out the research were: from the point of view of the approach to the problem, the qualitative paradigm was chosen; as for its objectives, the research has a descriptive and exploratory proposal; as a technical procedure, a field research was carried out, to analyze the testimonies collected from the foundations of the Theory of Social Representations, the main assumptions of content analysis were used. The analysis of the work was based on three categories, which are: a) The first impact: my work without guarantees; b) Am I a journalist? The unearned identity; and c) Future prospects. From the division of categories, it is possible to understand the impacts of precarious work on the lives of individuals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".