MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931391385 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.8005025

Euochin bethunei Wang & Zhang 2023, sp. nov.

2023· article· en· W6931391385 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicProblem Solving Skills Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmbolusHonorUncannySequence (biology)Extant taxon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Euochin bethunei sp. nov. (ƦĖḋƙẅss) Figs 4–18 Type material. Holotype: ♁ (MHBU-ARA-00022291), CHINA: Hunan Province, Yongzhou City, Dongan County, Damiaokou Town, Shunshan Park, Ehuangxi (kěUDZHƜȑȁđṖĀ), 26.416301°N, 111.0356687°E, 694 m a.s.l., 8 October 2015, leg. C. Jin, X. Guo & J. He. Paratype: 1♀ (MHBU-ARA-00025229), same data as holotype. Etymology. The specific epithet is in honor of a prominent internationalist from Canada, Dr. Henry Norman Bethune, who saved numerous Chinese soldiers during World War II and is widely commemorated by the people of China. Diagnosis. The males resemble Euochin bulbus (Bao & Peng, 2002) in genitalic features, but can easily be distinguished by the non-furcated retromarginal tooth of the chelicera and the tubular form of the embolus (Figs 8, 9–12, 15; vs. the compound retromarginal tooth of four cusps and the ribbon-like embolus in E. bulbus, see Bao & Peng 2002: fig. 14; Zha et al. 2014: figs 16–17, 19–20). The male palp is also like that of Euochin yaoi Wang & Li, 2021, but differs by the robust embolus and thin RTA (vs. thin embolus and strong RTA in E. yaoi, see Wang & Li 2021: figs 2B–D). The female epigyne is similar to that of E. bulbus, but can be recognized by the obviously smaller epigynal window and accessory gland (Figs 13, 17; see Zha et al. 2014: figs 14, 21). Description. Male. Habitus see Figs 4, 6. Carapace length 1.518; abdomen length 1.390. Eye measurements: AME 0.289, ALE 0.229, PME 0.067, PLE 0.190. Leg measurements: I 2.413 (0.813, 0.381, 0.559, 0.326, 0.334), II 2.276 (0.756, 0.354, 0.483, 0.364, 0.319), III 2.425 (0.807, 0.311, 0.483, 0.481, 0.343), IV 2.847 (0.853, 0.361, 0.614, 0.640, 0.379); leg formula: 4312. Color in ethanol: carapace dark. Abdomen dark, with light bands and patches. Chelicera (Fig. 8) with two promarginal and one retromarginal teeth. Palp (Figs 9–12, 15–16): tibia and cymbium with long white setal tuft dorsally; embolic disc circular, embolus relatively short and thick, tube-like, with notably large opening of sperm duct at tip; cymbial flange narrow but obvious; RTA short, dorsally margined with laminate process. Female. Habitus see Figs 5, 7. Carapace length 1.486; abdomen length 1.452. Eye measurements: AME 0.283, ALE 0.214, PME 0.062, PLE 0.194. Leg measurements: I 2.177 (0.747, 0.345, 0.490, 0.292, 0.303), II 2.004 (0.694, 0.346, 0.407, 0.295, 0.262), III 2.350 (0.831, 0.342, 0.443, 0.442, 0.292), IV 2.869 (0.871, 0.336, 0.637, 0.628, 0.397); leg formula: 4312. Color in ethanol: similar to that of male, but lighter in coloration. Chelicera as in male. Epigyne (Figs 13–14, 17–18): diameter of epigynal window less than that of spermatheca; median septum hourglass-like; copulatory opening located antero-centrally on margin of epigynal window; copulatory duct with obvious accessory gland; spermatheca ovoid, bottom close to genital furrow. Distribution. China (Hunan).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.709
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.203

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it