MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931392579 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6032671

Sphaeropthalma orestes

2017· article· en· W6931392579 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal socioeconomic and cultural dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeParatypeTaxonomy (biology)SquamataType locality

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sphaeropthalma orestes (Fox, 1899) Mutilla orestes Fox, 1899. Amer. Ent. Soc., Trans. 25: 256. ♂. Holotype data: no locality data (ANSP). Mutilla Pattersonae Melander, 1903. Amer. Ent. Soc., Trans. 29: 309. ♂. Holotype data: California, Fort Washington, 3 October 1895, R. Patterson (NMNH). Synonymized by Schuster (1958). Photopsis indigens Baker, 1905. Invertebrata Pacifica 1: 112. ♂. Holotype data: King’s Canon, Ormsby Co., Nevada (CUIC). Synonymized by Schuster (1958). Photopsis uniformis Baker, 1905. Invertebrata Pacifica 1: 113. ♂. Syntype data: California, Claremont (CUIC). Synonymized by Schuster (1958). Photopsis pedatus Baker, 1905. Invertebrata Pacifica 1: 115. ♂. Syntype data: California, Claremont (CUIC). Synonymized by Schuster (1958). Photopsis ingenuus Baker, 1905. Invertebrata Pacifica 1: 116. ♂. Holotype data: California, Claremont (CUIC). Synonymized by Schuster (1958). Photopsis salmani Mickel, 1938. Pan–Pacific Ent. 14: 178. ♂. Holotype data: California, Eagle Lake, 30 July 1936, C.E. Mickel (UMSP). Synonymized by Ferguson (1962). Sphaeropthalma (Photopsis) salmani fresnoensis Schuster, 1958. Ent. Amer. (n. s.) 37: 30. ♂. Holotype data: lost. Synonymized by Ferguson (1962). Sphaeropthalma (Photopsis) salmani oregano Schuster, 1958. Ent. Amer. (n. s.) 37: 31. ♂. Holotype data: lost. Synonymized by Ferguson (1962). Diagnosis of male. This species has mandibles that are strongly excised ventrally, have a vertical face, have a distinct basal tooth and an apex that is tridentate and oblique (see Boehme et al. 2012: Fig. 19), the posterior margin of the head is rounded, the mesosternum lacks processes, the second metasomal sternum lacks a distinct felt line, the pygidium is glabrous and the cuspis of the genitalia spatulate and lack plumose setae. Genitalia are illustrated in Boehme et al. (2012: Fig. 10). Diagnosis of female. This species has the dorsum of the body covered with sparse erect brachyplumose setae, but the integument is not obscured, the ventral margin of the mandible bears a large ventral basal tooth but lacks a dorsal tooth at the termination of the dorsal carina, the head below eyes is parallel, the head evenly rounded in lateral view, the first metasoma segment is petiolate with the second segment and the pygidium is granulate. Material examined. Mutilla orestes Holotype data: no locality data (ANSP). Mutilla Pattersonae Holotype data: California, Fort Washington, 3 October 1895, R. Patterson (NMNH). Photopsis uniformis Syntype data: California, Claremont (CUIC). Photopsis pedatus Syntype data: California, Claremont (CUIC). Photopsis ingenuus Holotype data: California, Claremont (CUIC). Photopsis salmani Holotype data: California, Eagle Lake, 30 July 1936, C.E. Mickel (UMSP). Distribution. USA (Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah and Washington) and northern Mexico (Baja California and Sonora). Activity. No specimens of this species were collected during the course of this study. Remarks. This species is a member of the S. orestes species-group (Pitts & Sadler 2015). The absence of S. orestes at the JTNP is odd because the species is known to be abundant throughout its range, which extends west of the Rocky Mountains from mainland Mexico to southern Canada. It was the second most abundant species at AMNWR (Boehme et al. 2012). It likely occurs in JTNP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicGlobal socioeconomic and cultural dynamicsFrench-language works237,207