Bibliographic record
Abstract
Key to species of Enaphalodes (updated from Lingafelter & Chemsak, 2002) 1. Elytra with pubescence dense and conspicuous, either erect or appressed orincombination..............................................................2 — Elytra withvery sparse,inconspicuous pubescence; U.S.A. (Arizona, California),Mexico (Sonora)................... E.seminitidus (Horn, 1885) 2(1). Elytrawithoneto threewell‑defined areasof dense,appressedpubescence.........................................................................................3 — Elytra withpubescence otherwise:either uniform,without patches of dense,appressedpubescence,orwithnumerous interconnecting, poorlydefined appressed patches,givingamottledappearance ...6 3(2). Mesosternal process with large central tubercle (Fig. 5); meso‑ and metafemoral apicesspiniform (Fig.4)............................................4 — Mesosternalprocesswithsmalltubercleoneachsideclosetocurvature (Fig. 8); meso‑ and metafemoral apices withrounded ortriangularlobes (Fig. 7)..........................................................................5 4(3). Elytral pubescence scattered, mostly pale yellow‑ochre, forming three distinctgroupsof spots (Fig.1); Costa Rica .............................. .................................................................... E.antonkozlovi, sp.nov. — Elytralpubescencecompact,white,formingtwogroupsof maculae; Panama, Colombia ................................. E.boyacanus Martins,2005 5(3). Elytra without dense patch of white pubescence on distal area (Fig.51); U.S. A (Texas), Mexico (Tamaulipas).................................... ............................................................. E.taeniatus (LeConte,1854) — Elytra with patch of white pubescence at apex (Fig. 6); Mexico (Chiapas, Oaxaca), Guatemala, Honduras, Belize, Nicaragua, Costa Rica ......................................................... E.coronatus (White,1853) 6(2). Elytranot appearing mottled; withoutpatches of appressedpubescence;erect,suberect,andappressedpubescence uniformindensity and distribution..........................................................................7 — Elytra appearing mottled; with patches of appressed pubescence; erect,suberect,orappressedpubescencenotuniformindensityand distribution ....................................................................................8 7(6). Large species, with pubescence inconspicuous and not heavily obscuring elytral surface; ventral pubescence mostly translucent with slight golden sheen; last ventral sternite of females with a deep notch at apex; U.S.A. (Georgia, Missouri, California, Arizona, Texas,Idaho,Florida,Minnesota,New Jersey,Mississippi,Alabama), Mexico (Sonora, Tamaulipas)............. E.hispicornis (Linnaeus,1767) — Moderate to large species with conspicuous uniform appressed fulvous pubescence that densely covers elytral surface; ventral pubescencemostlywhiteandnottranslucent,distinctlydifferentcolor from dorsal pubescence; last ventral sterniteof females withavery shallownotch at apex;U.S.A.(Florida)............................................. ......................................... E.archboldi Lingafelter & Chemsak,2002 8(6). Sides of pronotum at middle nearly as wide as base of elytra in males;elytralighttodarkbrownwithappressedpubescenceextensive not contrastingas intensely withelytral ground color (appearingdiffusely mottled).....................................................................9 — Pronotum with slight widening anterior to middle, but much narrower at widest point than base of elytra; elytra dark brown with appressedpubescence distinctlymottled.....................................11 9(8). Elytra with fulvous appressed pubescence and reddish or light brown ground color; without erect setae (except a few along suture and apical third); last abdominal sternite of females with very shallow notch at apex; Canada (Quebec, Ontario), U.S.A. (Georgia, Philadelphia, Texas, New York, South Carolina, Maine, Florida, Minnesota, Iowa, Ohio, Kentucky, Pennsylvania, Arizona, Mississippi, Massachusetts, Arkansas, Missouri, Alabama, Rhode Island,Maryland,Delaware,Districtof Columbia)............................ ............................................................. E.rufulus (Haldeman,1847) — Elytra with white or off‑white appressed pubescence and light to darkbrowngroundcolor (rarely reddish‑brown);longererecttosuberect setae present; last abdominal sternite of females with deep orshallownotch at apex...............................................................10 10(9). Pubescence of metasternum primarily translucent; last abdominal sterniteoffemaledeeplynotchedatapex;elytrawithdiffusepatches of off‑white pubescence; Canada (Quebec, Ontario), U.S.A. (New York,Pennsylvania,Maryland,North Carolina,Massachusetts, Texas, Districtof Columbia,Georgia,Florida,Arizona,Mississippi,Alabama, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana,Michigan, Missouri, New Jersey,Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Wisconsin), Mexico (Veracruz, Tamaulipas),Honduras............................ E.atomarius (Drury,1773) — Pubescence of metasternum primarily white and not translucent; last abdominal sterniteof female with very shallow notch at apex; elytrawithdiffusepatchesof whiteor off‑white pubescence; U.S.A. (Pennsylvania, Arizona, New York, Illinois, North Dakota, Ohio, Kentucky, New Jersey, Virginia, Mississippi, Nebraska), Mexico (Sonora)........................................ E.cortiphagus (Craighead,1923) 11(8). Apexof antennaltubercleselevated (Figs.28, 54)........................12 — Apexof antennaltuberclesflattened (Fig.55)..............................13 12(11). Prothorax wide, distinctly rounded laterally (Figs. 25, 28); antennomere IV short, thick, shorter than median pronotal impunctate region (Fig.25); Mexico (Baja California Sur).................................... .................................................................... E.cunninghami, sp.nov. — Prothorax moderately narrow, not distinctly rounded laterally (Fig. 48); antennomere IV elongate, narrow, longer than median pronotalimpunctateregion (Fig.48); Mexico (Tamaulipas) ............. ......................................................... E.niveitectus (Schaeffer,1905) 13(11). Antennae in female reaching elytral apex (Fig. 43); pubescence of headandelytraprimarily white;Mexico,Guatemala ....................... ....................................................................... E.senex (Bates,1884) — Antennae in female not reaching elytral apex; pubescence of head andpronotumochreoryellowish‑white ......................................14 14(13). Antennae reaching at about base of distal third of elytra (Fig. 17); pro‑ and mesosternal processes wide (Fig. 23); uniformlyochre pu‑ bescence;Guatemala.......................................... E.monzoni, sp.nov. — Antennae distinctly surpassingbase of distalthird of elytra (Fig.9); pro‑ andmesosternal processesnarrow (Fig.24);pubescenceamix‑ tureof ochreand yellowish‑white;Nicaragua .... E.bingkirki, sp.nov.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.039 | 0.017 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".