Prionospio steenstrupi Malmgren 1867
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Prionospio steenstrupi Malmgren, 1867 Prionospio steenstrupi Malmgren, 1867: 202.— Augener, 1906.— Foster, 1971a: 84.— Sigvaldadóttir & Mackie, 1993: 204 – 207, figs 1–2, 5, table 1–2.— Bone & Viéitez, 2002: 72. Prionospio (Prionospio) steenstrupi.— Maciolek, 1985: 332 –335, fig. 1.— Johnson, 1984: 6.47– 6.49, figs 6.37–6.38. Type locality. Iceland (65°53’N, 19°27’W), 73 m, clay. Type material. Syntypes (NHRM 3170). Records. USA: Florida (Foster 1971a); Alabama, Texas (Johnson 1984). Venezuela: Morrocoy (Bone & Viéitez 2002). Remarks. Sigvaldadóttir & Mackie (1993) redescribed this species and noted additional distinguishing features. They mention that the species only occurs off Iceland. All records of this species for the Grand Caribbean are questionable. Foster (1971) presented a description of Prionospio steenstrupi based on material from Alaska, Canada and the east coast of the USA. Foster’s specimens differ of P. steenstrupi in the shapes of second and third pairs of branchiae, and shapes of anterior neuropodial lamellae, also dorsal crests are present on setigers 6 to 16–18 and, in some specimens are present on chaetigers 15–25, and in other specimens crests are absent. We believe that the specimens recorded for the Grand Caribbean as P. steenstrupi Malmgren, 1867 represent a new species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".