Bibliographic record
Abstract
Clytia paulensis (Vanhöffen, 1910) Fig. 16c, d Campanularia paulensis Vanhöffen, 1910: 298, fig. 19a, b. Type locality. Île Saint-Paul, crater basin, shallow water (Vanhöffen 1910). Voucher material. Off St. Lucie Inlet, 27°10.8’N, 80°00.8’W, 44 m, 03.ii.1977, Johnson-Sea-Link, diver lockout, JSL 2161, two colonies, up to 2 mm high, without gonophores, coll. F. Stanton, ROMIZ B1103. Remarks. Although Clytia paulensis (Vanhöffen, 1910) is distinctive, presumably widespread, and now quite frequently reported (see synonymy list in Medel & Vervoort 2000), it was not described until the early twentieth century. Also surprising given its ubiquity is its remote type locality, a small volcanic island in the southern Indian Ocean. Fraser (1937a, 1944, 1946, 1948) did not mention it from the Americas, although Clytia longitheca (Fraser 1914) from the west coast is considered a synonym (Schuchert 2012). It has now been reported from both Atlantic and Pacific coasts of the American continents (Cairns et al. 2002; Oliveira et al. submitted). Recent taxonomic accounts of C. paulensis include those of Medel & Vervoort (2000) and Peña Cantero & García Carrascosa (2002); the latter authors add notes on ecology of the species. Reported distribution. Atlantic coast of Florida. First record. Western Atlantic. Chesapeake Bay (Calder 1971) to Brazil (Oliveira et al. submitted), and from Challenger Bank near Bermuda (Calder 2000), the Gulf of Mexico (Calder & Cairns 2009), and the Caribbean Sea (Calder & Kirkendale 2005). Elsewhere. Considered to be almost circumglobal in temperate and tropical waters (Cornelius 1995b; Ramil et al. 1998; Medel & Vervoort 2000; Peña Cantero & García Carrascosa 2002).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".