MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931443342 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6136089

Holmiella domackae Gapp & Lieberman, 2014, sp. nov.

2014· article· en· W6931443342 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Structure and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSagittal planeLobeRegular polygonTransverse planeLine (geometry)MidpointDorsum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Holmiella domackae sp. nov. Fig. 7 Type material. Holotype: PWNHC-2013.23.23; paratype: KUMIP 355548-355549, PWNHC-2013.23.24–25. Etymology. In honour of Hamilton College paleontologist Cindy Domack, who had an important influence on the professional development of IWG. Diagnosis. Cephalic border between intergenal spine and genal spine diverges anteriorly; genal spines have a sinuous shape; the posterolateral margins of LA diverge anteriorly. Description. Anterior border abaxial of sagittal line at an angle approximately 25 degrees to transverse line; length (sag.) anterior cephalic border directly anterior LA approximately 0.5 length of L3, developed as a flattened shelf; anterior portion of genal spines attached to cephalon at point directly abaxial to midpoint of LA along a sagittal line; genal spine deflected back rapidly and slightly outward creating an S-shape; length (sag.) LA approximately equal to length (sag.) of LO and L1; lateral margins of LA abaxial to lateral margins of LO; S3 convex anteriorly; ocular lobe separated from glabella by furrow; line between antero- and posteromedial tips of ocular lobe creates an angle with sagittal line of approximately 0-10 degrees; posterior ends of ocular lobes extend back to adaxial part of L1; width of ocular lobe at adaxial point about 60-70% length (sag.) of L1; width (tr.) of extraocular area opposite L1 approximately 55–65% interocular area; S3 gently convex and does not conjoin adaxially; S2 gently convex and not conjoined adaxially; S1 gently convex and not conjoined adaxially; L1, L2, and L3 are approximately equal in length (sag.); lateral margins of L2, L3, and LA constricted posteriorly; width (tr.) of LO approximately equal to width of L3, length (sag.) approximately 1.5 times length (sag.) of L1; small spine on posterior margin of LO; intergenal spines positioned directly abaxial of occipital spine; posterior border between LO and intergenal spine directed back posteriorly abaxially. Discussion. This species can be distinguished from H. falcuta and H. preancora by its much wider genal spines, which are directed abaxially before being directed posteriorly (similarly to H. falx), and have a slightly sinuous shape. The posterior cephalic border between the intergenal spine and the genal spine diverges anteriorly in H. domackae unlike in most other species of Holmiella (though see Fritz 1972, pl. 7, figs. 7, 12), which are parallel to subparallel. Lastly, the posterolateral margin of LA diverges anteriorly unlike H. taurus sp. nov. This species may be biostratigraphically significant as it appears to represent the only species of holmiid that survives into the Olenellus zone or Dyeran stage and thus crosses the Montezuman-Dyeran stage boundary sensu Webster (2011a, b) and Webster et al. (2011) (M. Webster, pers. comm.). Occurrence. Olenellus zone or Waucoban Series, Dyeran stage, sensu Webster (2011a, b) and Webster et al. (2011), early Cambrian, Sekwi Formation, Mackenzie Mountains, Northwest Territories, Canada, Section 2, in float, Section 3, 700– 800 m above the base of section, Section 14 in float.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicProtein Structure and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207