MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6931445065 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5262491

Rhabdias bakeri Tkach, Kuzmin et Pulis 2006

2013· article· en· W6931445065 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicMeta-analysis and systematic reviews
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlpha cellPharyngeal musclesTubulopathyDeformation (meteorology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rhabdias bakeri Tkach, Kuzmin et Pulis, 2006 (Fig. 15) Synonyms: Rhabdias ranae Walton, 1929 in Baker (1979). Host: Lithobates pipiens, L. sylvaticus (Amphibia: Anura: Ranidae). Site: lungs. Distribution: Northern Nearctic (northern U.S.A. and southern Canada). Description (after Tkach et al. 2006). Body 7.090 (4.051 –10.692) mm long, maximum width 245 (139–406) near vulva. Cuticular inflation less prominent in anterior part, from anterior end to level of distal part of oesophagus. In younger specimens, body cuticle evenly inflated along whole body. Oral opening oval, situated between 2 lateral pseudolabia. Each pseudolabium hemispherical in dorso-ventral view, rounded triangular in lateral view, with 2 small submedian protuberances (reduced submedian lips), each bearing a papilla. Vestibulum almost slit-like in apical view. Buccal capsule 17 (15–20) wide, 9 (7–12) deep, funnel-shaped in lateral view, round in apical view, with thick sclerotised walls. Lumen of buccal capsule narrow, cylindrical in lateral view. Anterior edge of buccal capsule slightly behind anterior edge of oesophagus. Oesophagus elongated, comparatively narrow, club-shaped, with dilated anterior muscular portion and egg-shaped posterior bulb. Oesophagus length 539 (465– 590), or 8.0 (5.4–11.9) % of body length. Width of oesophagus anterior end 36 (31–41), width of muscular dilation 43 (36–49), minimum width of glandular part 35 (27–44), width of oesophageal bulb 59 (48–72). Nerve ring encircling oesophagus posterior to its muscular dilation, at 174 (146–211) from oesophagus anterior end (32.3 [27.6–36.9] % of oesophagus length). Excretory pore opening just behind level of nerve ring. Intestine narrow at level of oesophageal-intestinal junction, then widening posteriorly. Rectum narrow, with thick sclerotised walls. Vulva postequatorial. Distance from anterior end to vulva 4.142 (2.297 –6.317) mm, or 58.7 (53.7–63.8) % of body length. Proximal ends of syngonia far overlapping at level of vulva. Egg size 50–61 × 94–113 (n = 19). Tail conical, elongated. Tail length 254 (193–336), or 3.7 (2.7–6.7) % of body length. Inflated body cuticle covering tail up to its tip in younger specimens; in older ones tail tip lacking inflated cuticle. Phasmids situated somewhat posterior to mid-length of tail. Remarks. The species is presumably a specific parasite of L. sylvaticus occasionally parasitizing other frogs (Tkach et al. 2006). Material studied: 33 specimens, including the type series (17 specimens, USNPC). References: Baker (1978), Tkach et al. (2006).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.582
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.141 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicMeta-analysis and systematic reviews→French-language works237,207→