MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931455614 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7469962

Homalocnemis nigripennis Philippi 1865

2022· article· en· W6931455614 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicStrategic Planning and Analysis
Canadian institutionsCanadian Food Inspection Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApex (geometry)LobeWingVeinBranching (polymer chemistry)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Homalocnemis nigripennis Philippi, 1865 (Figs 1–12, 28) Homalocnemis nigripennis Philippi, 1865: 752. Type-locality: Chile. Holotype. Male (not found in MNNC, presumably lost). Chile. Distribution. Chile: Valparaiso, Santiago (Fig. 28). References. Reed, 1888: 301 (cat.); Bezzi, 1905: 457 (list); Kertész, 1909: 8 (cat.); Collin, 1928: 54 (com.); Melander, 1928: 14 (dist.); Collin, 1933: 29 (redes., fig. 6a); Stuardo, 1946: 104 (cat.); Smith, 1967: 9 (cat.); Chvála, 1991: 13 (com.); Camousseight, 2005: 90 (list); Yang et al., 2007: 280 (cat.). Diagnosis. In addition to features in the key, this species is distinguished by the long, narrow digitiform epandrial process, male cerci separate from epandrium and female sternite 8 not greatly enlarged and apex weakly bilobed. Redescription. Wing length: 5.0– 5.1 mm. Male (Figs 1, 3, 6–8). Predominantly gray pruinose, especially mesopleuron, postpronotal lobe and notopleuron; prescutellar depression with long, anteriorly pointed pruinescent stripe, extending to near apex of scutum; front of scutum gray pruinose, with brown vittae along dorsocentral rows, apex of scutum and postsutural region (Figs 1, 4). Palpus with long whitish setae. Wing darkly infuscate, anal lobe well developed in both sexes (Figs 1–5). Vein R 2+3 strongly upcurved distally around pterostigma, ending well proximal to level of branching of vein R 4+5. Section between veins R 2+3 and R 4 equal to or longer than section between veins R 4 and R 5. Hind tarsomere 1 slightly swollen (Fig. 3). Tergite 8 less than half-length of respective sternite (Fig. 7), narrowed medially (Fig. 6); sternite 8 with desclerotized or depigmented medial area, with intersegmental membrane pigmented or weakly sclerotized posterolaterally (Fig. 7); remaining pregenital sclerites unmodified. Terminalia not highly sclerotized. Epandrial lamellae subrectangular, fused narrowly along dorsal bridge; with narrow, digitiform subapical process; dorsal margin with long, dense setae, nearly as long as width of epandrium (Fig. 6). Cercus oval, rounded posteriorly, with short dense ventroapical setae; not fused to epandrium or surstylus (Figs 6, 7). Hypoproct membranous medially, clothed in setulae laterally. Subepandrial sclerite broadly V-shaped, extending as bacilliform sclerites to surstylus; surstylus arched dorsally with apical notch; basally fused with epandrium (Figs 6, 8). Hypandrium (Figs 7, 8) with gonocoxal apodeme short, narrow, not greatly expanded horizontally; gonocoxal apodemes united dorsally by upright phallic plate; phallic plate paired, narrowly extending dorsally to base of subepandrial sclerite, opposite dorsal bridge of epandrial lamellae. Postgonites not differentiated. Hypandrium mostly fused with phallus, with apex of phallus emerging apically (Fig. 8); without lateral projections. Ejaculatory apodeme slender, elongate, positioned within hypandrium (Fig. 8). Female (Figs 2, 4–5). Same pattern of color as male (Fig. 1). Sternite 8 broadly joined ventrally, with apex weakly bilobed (Figs 10, 11), not greatly enlarged, subequal to anterior portion of sternite 8; sparsely clothed in short setae. Syntergite 9+10 well developed, completely divided medially (Fig. 9). Sternite 10 rectangular, weakly sclerotized; narrowly expanded along anterolateral margin of syntergite 9+10. Cercus ovoid fused to syntergite 9+10 (Figs 9–11). Spermatheca well sclerotized, tubular, tapered and sinuous apically (Fig. 12). Material examined. CHILE. Santiago [= Valparaiso], Marga-Marga, 7.ix.1927, Jaffuel & Pirion (1 ♀, USNM) [33°02′57″S – 71°30′10″W]; Province Santiago [Santiago, metropolis], Quebrada de la Plata, 27.x.1967, el. 510 m, 33°31′S – 70°47′W, E. Schlinger & M. Irwin (1♁, 1♀, CAS). Remarks. Marga Marga is located in the Valparaíso Region of the Province of Marga Marga, not Santiago Province as stated on the label of the studied specimen. As suggested by Collin (1933), H. nigripennis has a more northerly distribution than H. praesumpta (Fig. 28).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicStrategic Planning and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207