Bibliographic record
Abstract
Homalocnemis nigripennis Philippi, 1865 (Figs 1–12, 28) Homalocnemis nigripennis Philippi, 1865: 752. Type-locality: Chile. Holotype. Male (not found in MNNC, presumably lost). Chile. Distribution. Chile: Valparaiso, Santiago (Fig. 28). References. Reed, 1888: 301 (cat.); Bezzi, 1905: 457 (list); Kertész, 1909: 8 (cat.); Collin, 1928: 54 (com.); Melander, 1928: 14 (dist.); Collin, 1933: 29 (redes., fig. 6a); Stuardo, 1946: 104 (cat.); Smith, 1967: 9 (cat.); Chvála, 1991: 13 (com.); Camousseight, 2005: 90 (list); Yang et al., 2007: 280 (cat.). Diagnosis. In addition to features in the key, this species is distinguished by the long, narrow digitiform epandrial process, male cerci separate from epandrium and female sternite 8 not greatly enlarged and apex weakly bilobed. Redescription. Wing length: 5.0– 5.1 mm. Male (Figs 1, 3, 6–8). Predominantly gray pruinose, especially mesopleuron, postpronotal lobe and notopleuron; prescutellar depression with long, anteriorly pointed pruinescent stripe, extending to near apex of scutum; front of scutum gray pruinose, with brown vittae along dorsocentral rows, apex of scutum and postsutural region (Figs 1, 4). Palpus with long whitish setae. Wing darkly infuscate, anal lobe well developed in both sexes (Figs 1–5). Vein R 2+3 strongly upcurved distally around pterostigma, ending well proximal to level of branching of vein R 4+5. Section between veins R 2+3 and R 4 equal to or longer than section between veins R 4 and R 5. Hind tarsomere 1 slightly swollen (Fig. 3). Tergite 8 less than half-length of respective sternite (Fig. 7), narrowed medially (Fig. 6); sternite 8 with desclerotized or depigmented medial area, with intersegmental membrane pigmented or weakly sclerotized posterolaterally (Fig. 7); remaining pregenital sclerites unmodified. Terminalia not highly sclerotized. Epandrial lamellae subrectangular, fused narrowly along dorsal bridge; with narrow, digitiform subapical process; dorsal margin with long, dense setae, nearly as long as width of epandrium (Fig. 6). Cercus oval, rounded posteriorly, with short dense ventroapical setae; not fused to epandrium or surstylus (Figs 6, 7). Hypoproct membranous medially, clothed in setulae laterally. Subepandrial sclerite broadly V-shaped, extending as bacilliform sclerites to surstylus; surstylus arched dorsally with apical notch; basally fused with epandrium (Figs 6, 8). Hypandrium (Figs 7, 8) with gonocoxal apodeme short, narrow, not greatly expanded horizontally; gonocoxal apodemes united dorsally by upright phallic plate; phallic plate paired, narrowly extending dorsally to base of subepandrial sclerite, opposite dorsal bridge of epandrial lamellae. Postgonites not differentiated. Hypandrium mostly fused with phallus, with apex of phallus emerging apically (Fig. 8); without lateral projections. Ejaculatory apodeme slender, elongate, positioned within hypandrium (Fig. 8). Female (Figs 2, 4–5). Same pattern of color as male (Fig. 1). Sternite 8 broadly joined ventrally, with apex weakly bilobed (Figs 10, 11), not greatly enlarged, subequal to anterior portion of sternite 8; sparsely clothed in short setae. Syntergite 9+10 well developed, completely divided medially (Fig. 9). Sternite 10 rectangular, weakly sclerotized; narrowly expanded along anterolateral margin of syntergite 9+10. Cercus ovoid fused to syntergite 9+10 (Figs 9–11). Spermatheca well sclerotized, tubular, tapered and sinuous apically (Fig. 12). Material examined. CHILE. Santiago [= Valparaiso], Marga-Marga, 7.ix.1927, Jaffuel & Pirion (1 ♀, USNM) [33°02′57″S – 71°30′10″W]; Province Santiago [Santiago, metropolis], Quebrada de la Plata, 27.x.1967, el. 510 m, 33°31′S – 70°47′W, E. Schlinger & M. Irwin (1♁, 1♀, CAS). Remarks. Marga Marga is located in the Valparaíso Region of the Province of Marga Marga, not Santiago Province as stated on the label of the studied specimen. As suggested by Collin (1933), H. nigripennis has a more northerly distribution than H. praesumpta (Fig. 28).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".