Bibliographic record
Abstract
Coelocephalapion nodicorne species-group Diagnosis. Species of the C. nodicorne species-group differ from other Coelocephalapion species groups by the following combination of characters: vestiture of elytra usually with distinctive spot of denser scales along the sutural interval (postscutellar) and/or on base of interval 3, or median discal spot of darker scales; legs usually pale; sexual dimorphism of rostrum marked; dorsal margin of scrobe produced into an acute dentiform process; antenna with segments comparatively stout; head with large and prominent eyes, frons narrow, as wide or wider than prorostrum; subocular lateral ridges developed and not extending to posterior margin of the eyes; elytral striae at apex joining 1+9, 2, 3+4, 5+6, 7+8 (1+2+ 9 in C. iteratum and C. metum); interstriae 9 with one specialized seta in apical half, rarely two; median lobe (penis) slender, apex slightly bulbous, in dorsal view sides more or less expanded at base and orifice; penal apodemes moderately short; internal sac with four rows of fine teeth near orifice; tegminal plate produced laterally to membranous union with basal piece, lacking lobes and setae; fenestral sector unmarked, basal median area with more or less distinct low carina (Kissinger 1968, 2005). The species of this group are associated with Euphorbiaceae (Kissinger 2005).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".