Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stempellinella fimbriata (Ekrem) Figs 52A–D Diagnosis. Dorsal surface of head capsule coarsely granular without tubercles; cephalic S3-seta (clypeal) branched; ventral mouthparts as in Fig. 52B; labral lamella well developed pectinate plate; premandible with three slender apical teeth, brush distinct; SI comb-like on inner side with bases contiguous; antenna (Fig. 52C) 5-segmented with large finger-like spur on pedestal, curved ventrally (see Fig. 52A), 2 nd segment with alternating petiolate LO, blade reaching beyond distal LO, AR 1.0; mandible with pale dorsal tooth and three dark inner teeth; mentum with single pale median tooth, 1.75x as wide as 1 st lateral; VM plate fan-shaped, widely separated, with row of spinules along anterior margin; posterior end of abdomen as in Fig. 52D; procercus without spurs, with 4 long apical setae plus shorter one, lateral seta very long; anal tubules short, about half the length of posterior parapods. Portable sand case, generally straight and parallel-sided. Notes. The premandible in our larvae have three apical teeth and there is no indication of an additional basal tooth; otherwise, all other characters fit the species description given by Ekrem (2007). Ecology and habitat. Larvae were found in riffle and pools of study streams, typically occurred in the woody debris of study streams. The species was found sympatrically with Micropsectra in all habitats sampled. Species also occurs in sublittoral and profundal zones of Canadian lakes (Ekrem 2007). Sampling sites. Little White River, Arrowhead and Algonquin Provincial Parks. Nearctic distribution. Canada: Manitoba, Ontario, Nova Scotia. USA: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, South Carolina, Virginia, (Ekrem 2007).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".