Bibliographic record
Abstract
Liopterus haemorrhoidalis (Fabricius, 1787) Source of material. The four instar III larvae were collected in association with adults at the following locality: Belarus, Vicebsk Region, area near upy Village, wetland of evinka River, Carex, moss. 12.VIII.1998;H.Shaverdo leg. Diagnosis (instar III). The third instar of Liopterus haemorrhoidalis can easily be distinguished from that of the other species studied in this paper by the following combination of characters: HL = 1.40 mm; L3> 2.90 mm; U> 0.50 mm; head capsule subquadrate, strongly constricted at level of occipital region (Fig. 58), scale-like sculpticels lacking over frontoclypeus and parietale; anterior margin of frontoclypeus broadly convex, extending mesally at level of adnasalia (Fig. 58); adnasalia margined with short bluntly rounded teeth (Fig. 65); MP2/MP1 <1.30; GA/MP1 <1.50; 1.30 0.50; Palaearctic. Description, instar III (Figs 58–62, 65) Body: Measurements and ratios aimed to characterize body shape are shown in Table 6. Head (Figs 58, 60, 65): Head capsule subquadrate, strongly constricted at level of occiput; anterior margin of frontoclypeus broadly convex, extending mesally at about level of adnasalia; scale-like sculpticels lacking over frontoclypeus and parietale; adnasalia margined with mostly short bluntly rounded teeth (Fig. 65); HL = 1.36–1.39 mm; A/MP = 1.16–1.27; MP/LP = 1.67–1.74; MP2/MP1 = 1.15–1.28; GA/MP1 = 1.27–1.49; LP2/LP1 = 1.54–1.71; MNL/MNW = 2.63–2.71. Thorax (Figs 61–62): L3 = 2.86–3.06 mm. Abdomen (Fig. 59): LAS = 1.09–1.17 mm; LAS subconical, constricted posteriorly at point of insertion of urogomphi. Urogomphus, U = 0.60–0.63 mm, composed of one urogomphomere; U/HW = 0.38–0.40; U/LAS = 0.54–0.57. Chaetotaxy: Parietale with 7–10 temporal spines; position and number of secondary setae on legs are shown in Figs 61–62 and Table 7.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".