MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931496671 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7003405

Liopterus haemorrhoidalis

2022· article· en· W6931496671 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInstarMargin (machine learning)Table (database)SetaHead and neck

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Liopterus haemorrhoidalis (Fabricius, 1787) Source of material. The four instar III larvae were collected in association with adults at the following locality: Belarus, Vicebsk Region, area near upy Village, wetland of evinka River, Carex, moss. 12.VIII.1998;H.Shaverdo leg. Diagnosis (instar III). The third instar of Liopterus haemorrhoidalis can easily be distinguished from that of the other species studied in this paper by the following combination of characters: HL = 1.40 mm; L3> 2.90 mm; U> 0.50 mm; head capsule subquadrate, strongly constricted at level of occipital region (Fig. 58), scale-like sculpticels lacking over frontoclypeus and parietale; anterior margin of frontoclypeus broadly convex, extending mesally at level of adnasalia (Fig. 58); adnasalia margined with short bluntly rounded teeth (Fig. 65); MP2/MP1 <1.30; GA/MP1 <1.50; 1.30 <LP2/LP1 <1.90; inner margin of stipes with a dorsal linear row of spinulae (Fig. 60); profemur with less than 3 PV and more than 5 AV secondary setae; metafemur with more than 4 AV secondary setae (Fig. 61); urogomphus composed of one urogomphomere; U/HW = 0.40; U/LAS> 0.50; Palaearctic. Description, instar III (Figs 58–62, 65) Body: Measurements and ratios aimed to characterize body shape are shown in Table 6. Head (Figs 58, 60, 65): Head capsule subquadrate, strongly constricted at level of occiput; anterior margin of frontoclypeus broadly convex, extending mesally at about level of adnasalia; scale-like sculpticels lacking over frontoclypeus and parietale; adnasalia margined with mostly short bluntly rounded teeth (Fig. 65); HL = 1.36–1.39 mm; A/MP = 1.16–1.27; MP/LP = 1.67–1.74; MP2/MP1 = 1.15–1.28; GA/MP1 = 1.27–1.49; LP2/LP1 = 1.54–1.71; MNL/MNW = 2.63–2.71. Thorax (Figs 61–62): L3 = 2.86–3.06 mm. Abdomen (Fig. 59): LAS = 1.09–1.17 mm; LAS subconical, constricted posteriorly at point of insertion of urogomphi. Urogomphus, U = 0.60–0.63 mm, composed of one urogomphomere; U/HW = 0.38–0.40; U/LAS = 0.54–0.57. Chaetotaxy: Parietale with 7–10 temporal spines; position and number of secondary setae on legs are shown in Figs 61–62 and Table 7.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.927
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicGaze Tracking and Assistive TechnologyFrench-language works237,207