MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931499034 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.8142300

Barsaurea phaeoxanthia

2023· article· en· W6931499034 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMilitary Strategy and Technology
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapsuleFlankDifferential diagnosisSexual difference

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Barsaurea phaeoxanthia (Hampson, 1900) (Figs 2, 3, 7, 10) Miltochrista phaeoxanthia Hampson, 1900: 493 (Type locality: ‘ Assam, Khasis’ [Meghalaya]). Material examined: India, Meghalaya: 1 Ô, Cherrapunji (25.272857N, 91.7297E, 1430 m), 13.viii.2018, Santosh Singh leg. (13478/H10), West Bengal: 1 ♀, Sitong, (26.8715N, 88.3616E. 1350 m), 17.ix.2018, Santosh Singh leg. (13474/H10). Diagnosis: Forewing 13 mm in male and 16mm in female. Externally, B. phaeoxanthia is most closely related to B. apatani sp. nov. The differential diagnosis is discussed above. Furthermore, B. phaeoxanthia is distinct from its other two congeners by the larger size and in male genital capsule (Fig. 7) by the valva distally bifurcated, whereas in B. diehli (Fig. 8) and B. ketiga (Fig. 9) valva is acute apically. In female genitalia, B. phaeoxanthia is distinct from B. ketiga and B. diehli by the ductus bursae with posterior end narrower and the corpus bursae with lateral protrusion of moderate size whereas in B. diehli, the lateral protrusion is smaller and in B. ketiga, the lateral protrusion is larger (Volynkin et al. 2020: Figs. 34–40). Distribution: North East India (Singh et al. 2021), Cambodia (Cardamom, Seima, Koh Kong, Samkos, Pramaoy) (Bae et al. 2016) Malaysia (Cameron Highlands North) (Bucsek 2014).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicMilitary Strategy and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207