MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931503421 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6273589

Trigenotyla vaga Causey

2003· article· en· W6931503421 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGonopodHolotypeCaveTaxonomy (biology)SalientNomenclatureObject (grammar)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Trigenotyla vaga Causey Figs. 20, 21 Trigenotyla vaga Causey 1959:76, figs. 1, 2. Types: Male holotype from “a river ravine,” Latimer Co., Oklahoma, collected 9 December 1933 by J. R. Carpenter (AMNH). The body of the male holotype is in the American Museum collection, but the gonopods are not. According to a label in the type vial, the gonopods were mounted on a microscope slide; the slide cannot be found (L. Sorkin, pers. comm. 2002). A box of slides of trichopetalid gonopods is in the FSCA but one of T. vaga is not among them. Absent the crucial information from the gonopods, we must rely on Causey’s original description and drawings to establish the identity of T. vaga. Fortunately the drawings are good ones and show a number of salient features; they were probably made from the slide using a camera lucida or similar device. Etymology: The species name is a Latin adjective, “wandering,” and doubtless refers to the distance separating it from T. parca. Diagnosis: very similar to T. seminole but differing in the broader gonopod ectal coxites, larger size and definite pigmentation. Besides these features, Causey’s drawings show the fimbriate branch as lamelliform, as seen in two new species of Causeyella described below. The branch is more typically fimbriate in the material I have seen from Murray and Johnston Cos. The specimens from Wild Woman Cave described below are much paler than surface­collected ones, but otherwise do not seem to show any adaptations for cave life. Specimens from in or near Latimer Co. are required to safely pin down the identity of the Murray and Johnston Cos. specimens. Male from Wild Woman Cave: Length, 6.5 mm, width, 0.9 mm. Segmental shoulders pronounced, segmental setae nearly equal to body width. Color pale yellow to gray. Ocelli 15–17 in triangular eyepatch. Gonopods (Fig. 20) much as in T. seminole, differing in greater breadth of ectal coxite, tighter clustering of lateral setal groups. Ninth legpair (Fig. 21) as in T. parca, lacking vestigial terminal joints. Tenth and eleventh legpairs with coxal glands. Female from Wild Woman Cave: Length, 6.3 mm, width 0.9 mm. Nonsexual characters as in male. Distribution: Material examined (all FSCA): OKLAHOMA: Murray Co.: Wild Woman Cave, R. Harrell, 7, 28 February 1959, 2 March 1962, R. Harrell, 3 males, 3 females; Bitter Enders Cave, 29 December 1973, J. H. Black, male, female. Johnston Co: Horse Thief Cave # 2, 4 mi. SE of Pontotoc, 12 May 1970, J. H. Black, female. LeFlore Co: Choctaw Nation Historic Site, 27 September 2002, C. T. McAllister, female, probably this species. Literature Records: Black (1971) reported the Wild Woman Cave and Horse Thief Cave #2 records, but confounded under “ Trigenotyla sp.” probable records of blacki, seminole and vaga. The type locality is inexactly located, so on Fig. 33 the Latimer County record is simply indicated as the approximate center of the county. The LeFlore County record is of interest because the site is literally only a few meters from the border of Oklahoma with Arkansas, and makes it almost certain that T. vaga will be found in the latter state. Likewise, because of the continuity of habitat, I would expect this species to eventually be recorded from Texas. All T. vaga records to date are from south of the Canadian River; this stream appears to be an effective barrier separating vaga from the other species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.133 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomyFrench-language works237,207