MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931508023 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6059856

Peristenus pallipes Curtis 1833

2016· article· en· W6931508023 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEntomological Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCzechHolarcticDistribution (mathematics)ChinaScarabaeoidea

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Peristenus pallipes (Curtis, 1833) Distribution in Iran. Guilan, Mazandaran (Farahani et al. 2013b; Sedighi and Madjdzadeh 2015), Iran (no specific locality) (Khanjani 2004). Distribution outside Iran. One of the most frequently collected euphorine species in the Holarctic region (Papp 2003a). Albania (Fahringer 1924; Yu et al. 2012 as Leiophron (Peristenus) pallipes), Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bosnia-Hercegovenia, Bulgaria, Canary Islands, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Kazakhstan, Korea, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Mongolia, Netherlands, Norway, Romania, Slovenia, Spain, Switzerland, Ukraine, former Yugoslavia (Yu et al. 2012 as Leiophron (Peristenus) pallipes), Belgium (Wesmael 1835; Yu et al. 2012 as Leiophron (Peristenus) pallipes), Canada (Strickland 1946; Muesebeck 1936 as Euphorus pallipes; Loan 1980; Yu et al. 2012 as Leiophron (Peristenus) pallipes; Sharanowski et al. 2014), China, Taiwan (Chen and van Achterberg 1997), Croatia (Graeffe 1908; Yu et al. 2012 as Leiophron (Peristenus) pallipes), Czech Republic (Lozan et al. 2010; Yu et al. 2012 as Leiophron (Peristenus) pallipes), Hungary (Szépligeti 1896; Györfi 1959; Papp 2006, 2008; Yu et al. 2012), Greece (Papp 2003a; Yu et al. 2012), Macedonia, Serbia (Papp 2010; Yu et al. 2012 as Leiophron (Peristenus) pallipes), Mexico (González-Hernández 2004), Poland (Bilewicz-Pawińska 1977, 1982; Yu et al. 2012 as Leiophron (Peristenus) pallipes), Russia (Tobias 1971 as Euphorus pallipes; Yu et al. 2012 as Leiophron (Peristenus) pallipes), Serbia (Žikić et al. 2000), Turkey (Koldaş et al. 2007, 2013; Yilmaz et al. 2010; Güçlü and Özbek 2011; Yu et al. 2012 as Leiophron (Peristenus) pallipes), UK (Marshall 1885 as Euphorus tuberculifer; Marshall 1887 as Euphorus pallipes and as E. tuberculifer; Brindley 1939 as Euphorus pallipes; Broad and Shaw 2009; Yu et al. 2012 as Leiophron (Peristenus) pallipes), USA (Muesebeck 1936 as Euphorus pallipes; Yu et al. 2012 as Leiophron (Peristenus) pallipes). Host records. A large number of hosts have been reported from Miridae (Hemiptera): Adelphocoris lineolatus (Goeze) (Khanjani 2004; Yu et al. 2012), A. rapidus (Say), Capsus ater (Linnaeus), Closterotomus norvegicus (Gmelin), Labops hirtus Knight, Leptoptema dolabrata (Linnaeus), Lygus spp., Notostira erratica (Linnaeus), Plagignathus medicagus Arrand, Trigonotylus coelestialium (Kirkaldy). Other records are from Timarcha tenebricosa (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) (Yu et al. 2012). It has also been reported as a parasitoid of Lygus lineolarisi (Palisot de Beauvois) (Hemiptera: Miridae) (Bilewicz-Pawińska, 1977, 1982; Lim 1974). In Canada, this species has been reported as parasitoid of a number of plant bugs (Hemiptera: Miridae): Adelphocoris lineolatus (Goeze), A. rapidus (Say), Leptopterna dolobrata (Linnaeus), Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois), Caspus ater (Linnaeus) (Loan 1980). It has been reported from Adelphocoris lineolatus (Goeze), Leptopterna dolobrata (Linnaeus), Trigonotylus coelestialium (Kirkaldy) (Bilewicz-Pawińska 1977, 1982), Closterotomus norvegicus (Gmelin) (Brindley 1939) in the UK. The following mirid species (Hemiptera: Miridae) has been also reported: Leptopterna dolobrata (Linnaeus) (Brindley 1939; Loan 1965; Bilewicz-Pawińska 1982), Stenotus binotatus (Fabricius), Orthotylus virescens (Douglas & Scott) (Waloff 1967), Notostira erratica (Linnaeus) (Bilewicz-Pawińska 1982), Adelphocoris lineolatus (Goeze) (Bilewicz-Pawińska 1977, 1982).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.889
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0410.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicEntomological Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207