Bradyfallotaspis nicolascagei Gapp, Lieberman, Pope & Dilliard, 2011, n. sp.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bradyfallotaspis nicolascagei n. sp. (Fig. 4.1–4.8) Type material. Holotype KUMIP 320701. Paratypes KUMIP 320702-320707 and PWNHC-2009.20.9-2009.20.17 from Nevadella zone, Early Cambrian, Sekwi Formation, Mackenzie Mountains, Northwest Territories, Canada (Section 1, 200– 400 m above base of formation; Section 2 in float; Section 14 in float). There are a total of 16 specimens. Etymology. Named in honor of trilobite enthusiast and Hollywood actor Nicolas Cage. Diagnosis. Anterior cephalic border (sag.) varies between half to equal the length (sag.) of LO; preglabellar area equal to combined length (sag.) of L3 and LA; ocular lobes not in contact with posterior border furrow. Description. Width of cephalon (tr.) is greater than or equal to twice the cephalic length (sag.); anterior cephalic border length (sag.) is narrow, varying between half to equal the length (sag.) of LO; preglabellar field is present with length (sag.) equal to length (sag.) of LO and L1; a pit-like structure is present in most specimens where the ocular ridges contacts L3 and LA; width (tr.) of the extraocular area varies from 1.5–2 times the width (tr.) of the interocular area; a strongly incised SO is present when preservation allows. Discussion. This species differs from all other species of Bradyfallotaspis by its possession of an anterior cephalic border with length (sag.) equal to approximately half the length (sag.) of LO and a preglabellar area equal to the combined length (sag.) L3 and LA. Further, the ocular lobes are not in contact with the posterior border furrow, unlike B. coriae and B. fusa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".