Lypoglossa manitobae Gusarov, sp. n.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
2. Lypoglossa manitobae Gusarov, sp. n. (Figs. 51–63). Lypoglossa angularis: Hoebeke,1992: 390, ex parte. Type material. Holotype: CANADA: Manitoba: ɗ, Riding Mtn. Nat. Park, Stathclair Trail, 4.5 km S Kinnis Creek, 12.ix.1979 (A.Smetana) (CNCI). Paratypes: CANADA: Manitoba: 2ɗɗ, 3ΨΨ, same data as the holotype (CNCI (2), CUIC (1), KSEM (1), ZMUN (1)); Ψ, Riding Mtn. Nat. Park, 1 km SE Long Lake, 16.ix.1979 (A.Smetana) (CNCI). Diagnosis. Lypoglossa manitobae differs from L. angularis in having a smaller body size, and shorter and blunter dentiform projections at the base of the apex of the median lobe (Figs. 55–59; 25–29). Lypoglossa manitobae can be distinguished from the Palaearctic L. lateralis by the following characters: pronotum and elytra lighter than head and abdomen; punctation of head and pronotum not asperate; and a distinct shape of the aedeagus and spermatheca (Figs. 55–63; 72–78). L. manitobae differs from L. franclemonti in having a smaller body size; the apex of the median lobe (in parameral view) constricted basally (Figs. 55–57; 64–65); with a dentiform projection on each side of the base of the apex (Figs. 55–59; 64–67); and a smaller spermatheca (Figs. 62–63; 70). Description. Length 3.2–3.5 mm. Head and abdomen brown; pronotum, elytra, legs, antennae and mouthparts light brown. Head surface glossy, with weak isodiametric microsculpture, with fine punctation, distance between punctures equals 1–2 times their diameter. Eyes 1.0–1.3 times as long as temples. Antennal articles 4–6 elongate, 7–10 subquadrate. Pronotum transverse, 1.4 times as wide as head, width 0.81–0.87 mm, length 0.60– 0.66 mm, width to length ratio 1.3–1.4; surface glossy, with weak isodiametric microsculpture; punctation finer than on head, distance between punctures equals 2 times their diameter. Elytra wider (0.89–0.91 mm) and longer (0.66–0.74 mm; measured from humeral angle) than pronotum (elytral length to pronotal length ratio 1.1), 1.3 times as wide as long, surface glossy, with poorly visible microsculpture; punctation stronger and denser than on pronotum, distance between punctures equals ½–1 times their diameter. Abdominal terga with very fine (poorly visible at 70x) microsculpture consisting of transverse waves; terga 3–5 matte due to fine and dense punctation, distance between punctures equals 1–3 times their diameter, terga 6–7 glossy, with sparser punctation, distance between punctures equals 2–6 times their diameter. In males, head with weak medial impression and pronotum with broad impression along midline. Aedeagus as in Figs. 55–61. Spermatheca as in Figs. 62–63. Distribution. Lypoglossa manitobae is known only from Riding Mountains National Park in Manitoba (Fig. 18) where it is sympatric with L. franclemonti. Natural History. No information is available.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".