Diploneis cristata Jovanovska & Wilson & Hamilton & Stone 2023, sp. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diploneis cristata sp. nov. (LM Figs 47–52, SEM Figs 53–60) Valves are weakly asymmetric, rhombic-elliptic to elliptic with convex margins and bluntly round apices (Figs 47–53). Valve length is 47–80.5 μm and valve width is 26–41 μm. The axial area is narrow, lanceolate, widening at the center to form a lanceolate central area (Figs 47, 55), 4.5–8.5 μm wide. Externally, the longitudinal canal is broad, lanceolate to linear, slightly expanded in the middle of the valve with three to four rows of cribrate (10–20 poroids) areolae narrowing into one at the valve apices (Figs 53, 55, 56). Internally, a thick non-porous slightly raised silica plate encloses the longitudinal canal (Figs 57, 59). Externally, the raphe is filiform, curved; the proximal ends are weakly deflected and positioned within a teardrop depression (Figs 53, 55). The distal raphe ends are unilaterally bent to the same side and terminate on the valve face (Figs 53, 56). Internally, the raphe branches are slightly arched with simple proximal and distal ends that are slightly elevated in a deep depression formed by the longitudinal canal (Fig. 57). The striae are parallel at mid-valve becoming radiate towards the valve apices, 7–8 in 10 μm. Striae are uniseriate throughout (Fig. 54). The striae are composed of large round to rectangular areolae covered externally with cribra (>40 poroids; hardly visible on the illustrated specimens), 7–8 in 10 μm. Each areola opens into deep pits and sometimes separated by short crested fin-like ridge ornamentations that are forming from the areolae wall (white arrowed Fig. 54). The inter-areolar thickenings have fin-like shaped silica ornamentations serrated into ca. 3–9 notched edges (Figs 54, 56). The areolae increase in size towards the valve margins (Figs 53, 55). Internally, the alveoli open via a single elongated opening covered with a thin silica layer (Figs 59, 60). The valvocopula has serrated advalvar edges (Figs 57, 59, 60). Type:— REPUBLIC OF ZAMBIA, Lake Tanganyika, Chituta Bay, at 768 m elevation; mud and mussels, 33 m water depth, collected SCUBA diving, 8°42’56.0” S 31°09’15.0” E, W. Salzburger, 5 th September 2018 (holotype designated here, circled specimen BM-108995! = Fig. 48, isotypes ANSP-GC17224!, CANA-129321!). Type material CANA-129321. Registration: http://phycobank.org/103701 Pictures of the isolated specimen:— LM micrograph on 1000× magnification (Fig. S2e). Sequence data:— Plastid gene rbc L sequence (GenBank accession: OQ 660279). Etymology:— The specific epithet ‘ cristata ’ is derived from the distinct crested fin-like ridge ornamentations on the valve face. Ecology and distribution:— Diploneis cristata sp. nov. has been observed along the Tanzanian and Zambian coasts of Lake Tanganyika. It is not a very frequent species in this alkaline lake with moderate mineral content, occurring mainly on muddy and sandy substrates between 5 and 25 m water depth, but also as tychoplankton in the littoral areas and in plankton up to 60 m depth. This species occurs mainly in the southern sub-basin at Kalambo Falls Lodge, Isanga Bay, Chituta Bay, Mutondwe Island, and Ndole Bay (Fig. 1c, f). In this sub-basin, the species occurs mainly together with D. gigantea sp. nov., D. fossa sp. nov., D. cocquytiana sp. nov., and D. salzburgeri sp. nov. Smaller population sizes of this species have been observed in the central and northern sub-basins in Kalya Bay, Mahale National Park, Rukoma area, Buhingu Island, and Kiganza Bay (Fig. 1c–e). In these areas, the species usually coexists with D. serrulata sp. nov., D. cocquytiana sp. nov., D. lunata sp. nov., D. salzburgeri sp. nov., and D. tanganyikae sp. nov. Main differential characters:— Valve size and shape, striae density, external thick fin-like ornamentations across the valve, fin-like thickening within areolae, and poroids>40 per areola. Similar species:— Diploneis tanganyikae sp. nov., D. salzburgeri sp. nov., and Diploneis buriatica Kulikovskiy & Lange-Bertalot (2015: 91).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".