Bibliographic record
Abstract
Project focuses on employing the methodology of Education Through Sport (ETS) as a vehicle of upskilling and curricular enhancement of Sport Coaches and Trainers working in the field with disadvantaged target groups with migrant background in the perspective of fostering inclusion and equal opportunities in as well as through Sport for migrants. The project pursues the specific Erasmus+ Small Collaborative Partnership priorities related to encouraging social inclusion and equal opportunities in Sport. Our Project aims at answering the challenge of social exclusion of migrants in Europe, with a particular focus on addressing the compelling issue of systematic under representation of migrants in non-playing roles within Sport clubs and organizations. Migration is now one of the biggest challenges for the European societies and political systems. As migrant fluxs increase and with the terroristic fears widespreading after the recent attacks, intercultural dialogue and social integration is urgently needed while it has been stated many times that Europe can and should use the potentials of immigrants. Besides sport has a positive function for personal health and fitness as well and help people to improve their own wellness along with their capacity to be part of a team and/or to enhance a sportsmanship attitude. As politics across Europe is showing all its difficulties relating to welcoming immigrants policies and integrationla ones, sport can be the paicific while effiective tool for strenghthening integration. Not to forget that project partners are established in countries interested by migrant fluxes and immigrant presence: Turkey, Spain and Italy whose role in Euroepan politics has been risen recently as key-role in tackling new waves of immigrants and its related integration policies. The following questionnaire analysis have been prepared to be used in the project titled "Integration of Refugees Through Sport" carried out under the Erasmus + Sports program supported by the European Commission.The research aims to identify the integration, development and adaptation needs of refugees, trainers, physical education teachers, sport trainers and candidate sports scientists.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".