Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genus Axonopsis Piersig, 1893 Axonopsis (Axonopsis): Cook, 1974a, pp. 331–332, figs. 1377–1379, 1381, 1382, 1384–1386. Axonopsis: Cook, 1974b, pp. 55–58, figs. 78–85. Axonopsis (in part): Smith & Cook, 1991, p. 577. Axonopsis (in part): Smith et al., 2001, p. 614. Axonopsis (in part): Smith et al., 2010, p. 555. Axonopsis (Axonopsis): Pešić, Smit & Saboori, 2012, pp. 52–54, fig. 38. Diagnosis. Larva: Partially described by Piersig (1897 –1900), but insufficiently known to permit listing of diagnostic character states. Adults (modified from Cook 1974a, 1974b): Character states of Axonopsis -like mites. Dorsal and ventral shields broadly fused anteriorly; lacking caudal development posteriorly. Dorsal furrow bearing two pairs of glandularia and three pairs of lyrifissures on small platelets. Dorsal shield bearing three or four pairs of glandularia with one pair flanking excretory pore. Ventral shield on each side with ridge originating at lateral end of suture line between third and fourth coxal plates extending anterolaterally to lateral edge of shield; anterior coxal plates relatively wide and lacking hook-like projections; fourth coxal plate lacking glandularia in region between genital field and opening for insertion of fourth leg. Genital field bearing four pairs of acetabula. Suture lines between genital field and ventral shield well delineated. Gnathosoma with mouth opening terminal in position; gnathosomal apodemes moderately long. Pedipalp tibia relatively long and slender, lacking ventral projection, and bearing two slender setae distoventrally; tarsus shorter than tibia. Fourth leg with segments not flattened and telofemur not reduced in size. Type species. Axonopsis bicolor Piersig = Axonopsis complanata (Müller). Species included. Axonopsis complanata (Müller) (Europe), A. bimaculata (Cook) (central North America), A. gracilipalpis Viets (Sumatra), A. hyporheica Pešić, Smit & Saboori (Iran), A. indica Cook (India), A. keralensis Cook (India), A. lundbladi Cook (West Africa), A. magnipalpis Cook (West Africa), A. mediolutea Viets (Java), A. phreaticola Cook (India), A. sabulonis Cook (eastern North America), A. vayitriensis Cook (India). Axonopsis longipalpis Imamura from Japan has been tentatively allocated to this genus. There are several undescribed species of Axonopsis from North America in the Canadian National Collection of Insects and Arachnids. Distribution. Holarctic (Eurasia, North America), India, Southeast Asia, West Africa. Discussion. Cook (1974a, 1974b) employed a broad concept of Axonopsis including eight subgenera. We are here proposing a very restricted concept of the genus Axonopsis including only species previously allocated to the nominate subgenus. The other seven taxa previously regarded as subgenera of Axonopsis are here either elevated to full generic status or allocated as subgenera to one or another of the newly recognized full genera.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".