MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931576755 · doi:10.5287/ora-mp4296bzv

A reassessment of the significance of the life and work of George Savile 1st Marquis of Halifax, 1633-95

2023· dissertation· en· W6931576755 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThroneOpposition (politics)PoliticsGeorge (robot)SympathyBiographyElement (criminal law)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis studies the career and political writings of George Savile, 1st Marquis of Halifax (1633-1695). Halifax played a significant role in the politics of Restoration England. An opposition politician who broke with the earl of Shaftesbury over the issue of Exclusion, he helped to ensure James II succeeded to the throne in 1685. After decisively intervening in the Revolution he proffered the Crown to William and Mary, under whom he served as Lord Privy Seal. His interventions in the politics of the period, though sporadic, were decisive, and helped to avert the three interlinked catastrophes he truly feared: renewed civil war, the destruction of European Protestantism, and the collapse of England into tyranny. An active politician he also wrote widely: seven of his pamphlets were published during his life, and he left a variety of unpublished notes and maxims. Known in subsequent centuries as ‘The Trimmer’ he has been depicted as an advocate of moderation. Despite his importance the only significant biography of him dates from 1898 and although a magisterial edition of his works was published in 1989 he has subsequently received comparatively little attention. The thesis makes three arguments. First that Halifax was committed to comprehending Presbyterians within the Church of England, and therefore sits within an element of mainstream religious thought in Restoration England. Deeply concerned about the fate of Reformed Christians in continental Europe, his religious sentiments influenced his views on foreign policy. Second, that situating his writings within contemporary discourses on republicanism shows his sympathy with such ideas. His 1680 Limitations proposal would have effectively reduced the English monarch to a ‘Duke of Venice’. Third, that his disillusionment with the aftermath of the 1688 Revolution demonstrates his concern that the power of the nobility was being eclipsed by economic and military changes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.366
Threshold uncertainty score0.727

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0240.020
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)Same topicPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesFrench-language works237,207