MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6931585889 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6313364

Cybaeus viator Bennett & Copley & Copley 2022, spec. nov.

2022· article· en· W6931585889 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmphibian and Reptile Biology
Canadian institutionsImmunoPrecise (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeDorsumTibiaPatellaSetaKeel

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cybaeus viator Bennett spec. nov. Figs 37–39, 43–48, 50 Type material. U.S.A.: California: Holotype male. Colusa County, two miles northwest of Fouts Springs, 17.x.1955, Schuster, (AMNH). Paratypes. Colusa. 1♂ 4♀, 2 mi. NW of Fouts Springs, 17.x.1955, Schuster, (AMNH); Lake, 1♂, Paul Hoberg Airport, nr. Howard Springs, 21.ii.1954, no collector (CAS); Mendocino. 2♀, 4.2 mi. S of Piercy, 17.ii.1967, V. D. Roth (CAS). Etymology. The specific name is taken from the Latin for “wayfarer” and refers to the resemblance of the patellar apophysis in dorsal and retrolateral views to the universal hitchhiker's thumb gesture. Diagnosis. The male of C. viator spec. nov. is diagnosed by the form of the patellar apophysis (Figs 43–44) and the proximal arm of the tegular apophysis (Figs 45–46, 48) and is discussed in the diagnoses of C. chauliodous and C. somesbar. The female of C. viator spec. nov. is distinguished by the small, parenthesis-like atrial openings (Figs 37–30) and the reduced vulval ducting (Figs 38–39); these characteristics are discussed in the diagnoses of C. chauliodous, C. lockeae spec. nov., C. septatus, and C. somesbar. Description. As in diagnosis. Other descriptive characters are presented here. Ventral tibia I macrosetae 2–1p(or 0)–2–1p–0. Femora very lightly banded ventrally in some specimens. Male (n=3). Patellar apophysis (Figs 43–44, 47) longer than width of patella; tip angular and arched dorsally; up to six peg setae with usually three on tip and one, slightly larger, isolated near middle of patellar apophysis. Measurements (n=3). CL 2.10, 2.18, 2.40; CW 1.55, 1.65, 1.80; SL 1.05, 1.09, 1.20; SW 0.99, 1.05, 1.11. Holotype largest specimen. Female (n=6). Vulva (Figs 38–39) heavily sclerotized with very thick walls; spermathecal stalks very short, nearly linear, not contiguous; spermathecal bases relatively small. Measurements (n=4). CL 2.05–2.23 (2.15), CW 1.38–1.50 (1.45), SL 1.03–1.12 (1.07), SW 0.98–1.04 (1.00). Distribution and natural history. (Fig. 50) Mendocino, Lake, and Colusa Counties in central northwestern California. The males were collected in October and February.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.100

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicAmphibian and Reptile Biology→French-language works237,207→