Chironomus (Chironomus) atritibia Malloch
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chironomus (Chironomus) atritibia Malloch Chironomus (Chironomus) atritibia Malloch, 1934: 16. Material examined. Lake Winnipeg light traps: 0.5 km off George Island, 1 male, 13.vii. 1969; Old Fishing Dock, 1 male, 18.viii. 1971; Calder’s Dock, 3 males, 26.viii. 1971. Of the five males caught in light traps three are intersexes. The normal male has an AR of 4.08, 7 sensilla chaetica on p2 and 6 on p3. The male intersexes have female antennae, 38–54 sensilla chaetica on p2 and 42(1) sensilla chaetica on p3. Distribution and ecology. The species was previously known from New York, Québec, Ontario, Northwest Territories, British Columbia and Washington (Townes 1945:131, Saether 1970: 7, Saether & McLean 1972: 11, Johnson & Brinkhurst 1971: 1696, Wiederholm 1976: 24, Oliver et al. 1990: 42). Martin (2012) mentions that most specimens listed by Townes (1945), other than the type, probably are C. cucini Webb. The larva is of the C. salinarius type and characteristic for mesotrophic to moderately oligotrophic lakes (Saether 1975: 3130, Wiederholm 1976: 30). Although no larvae were found in bottom samples from Lake Winnipeg, the species is present in some areas of the northern basin and in the Narrows.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".