MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6931603819 · doi:10.5683/sp3/j1njyk

Canadian Census Data Inventory, 1666-2021

2024· dataset· en· W6931603819 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2024
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCensusAmerican Community SurveyMetadataDocumentationPopulationGeneral partnershipData dictionaryDeliverable

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Canadian Census Data Inventory is a project of the Canadian Census Data Discovery Partnership (CCDDP). The CCDDP project aims to facilitate historical research by reducing the barriers to access and use of Canadian census data. Using the search tab of The Census Data Discovery Portal users can discover historical and contemporary Canadian census materials and data items held by numerous institutions across the country. This dataset contains the original inputted and captured census items and corresponding metadata fields for the inventory tables in English and French including enhanced census terms for finding census data. Additional improvements are being made to the inventory and will be addressed by future infrastructure. Censuses, or population counts, have been conducted in the territory now known as Canada since 1665-66 in New France. Canada’s census is our most valuable primary economic, social, and cultural data set, and is an essential research tool for the formation of new knowledge and understanding about the populations that lived here in the past and present. The sources of information that make up these censuses are rich, diverse, and complex. They consist of databases of archival records, publications, and data files, containing a mix of primary data, expert analyses, and supporting documentation. This project is focused on those sources that contain data, and documentation that supports the use of the data. The CCDDP project is funded by a SSHRC Partnership Development Grant (2021-2024). Key deliverables are inventorying Canada’s historical census data, the design and delivery of this proof-of-concept bilingual discovery portal, and developing a set of recommendations for future work. Please see the project website for the full list of project partners, investigators and collaborators, and join our listserv to receive project updates. Inventory data last updated: 2024-03-31

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score0.341

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0110.033
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1020.057

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealis→Same topicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics→French-language works237,207→