Molophilus (Molophilus) nigrescens Lackschewitz 1940
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Molophilus (Molophilus) nigrescens Lackschewitz, 1940 Figures 10–12 Molophilus nigrescens Lackschewitz 1940a: 17 (description), Pl. 1, Figs 10 a–c (male terminalia). Diagnosis. Medium-sized species within Molophilus. Body dark brown, restrictedly patterned with yellow, mostly shiny, locally suffused with greyish pruinosity. Gonocoxite of male terminalia without dorsal and lateral lobe. Outer (dorsal) gonostylus shorter than inner (ventral) gonostylus, slender, pointed at tip. Inner gonostylus somewhat stouter, shortly bifurcate at apex. Wing length 4.7–5.3 mm. Redescription of male terminalia (Figs 10–12). Dorsal portion of gonocoxite rather short, without dorsal and lateral lobe, broadly rounded at apex in lateral view, without noticeable process at posteroventral edge. Lateral excision comparatively deep and moderately wide. Ventral lobe of gonocoxite generally slender and long, its somewhat narrowed and rounded tip level with apex of dorsal portion of gonocoxite. Both gonostyli smooth and pale. Outer gonostylus slender, generally straight, pointed at tip, reaching about to three fourths length of inner gonostylus. The latter exceeding ventral lobe by about one third its length, bent ventrally and tapered to slender distal part with shortly bifurcate apex. Aedeagus of moderate length and breadth, roughly producing bayonet-like shape, unevenly arched and expanded at mid-length, with erect, even retrorse tooth at distal bend ventrally and with apical part quite straight. Aedeagal plate moderate in size, generally triangular in ventral/ventrocaudal aspect, with rounded apex and barely distinct tooth laterally at mid-length. Type material examined. The species was described from an unspecified number of specimens [“ Spanien, Andalusien, Algeciras, 26.IV.–27. V.1925, 3 ƤƤ in Mehrzahl (Zerny).” (Lackschewitz 1940a: 18)]. Altogether 5 3 and 5 Ƥ are now deposited in NHMW (P. Sehnal, pers. comm.). I have examined four male syntypes, all belonging to M. (M.) nigrescens, and I here select as lectotype the one dissected and illustrated by me (Figs 10–12). Lectotype 3 (by present designation): Spain, Andalucía, Algeciras, 22.–27.v.1925 (H. Zerny leg.) (NHMW), labelled “Andalusia / Algeciras / 22.–27.V ’25 Zerny” (printed), “ M. nigrescens / nov. sp. / det. Laksch.” (printed, orange). Labelled as lectotype by the present author (“ LECTOTYPE / Molophilus / nigrescens Lacksch. 3 / J. Starý 2010”; printed red label). The specimen is pinned, practically intact, with only apex of abdomen cut off. Terminalia placed in a sealed plastic tube with glycerine, pinned with the specimen. Paralectotypes: 3 3, micro-pinned on a piece of foam or pinned, with the same labelling as for lectotype, except for dates (“ 28.–30.IV ‘25”, “1.– 10.V ‘25”, “ 12.– 20.V ‘25”), accordingly labelled as paralectotypes by the present author. Two paralectotypes have the terminalia mounted by Lackschewitz in Canada balsam between celluloid slides, pinned with the specimens. The lectotype is designated here to stabilize the concept of the name with respect to M. (M.) carbonis sp. n. Discussion. The differences of M. (M.) nigrescens from M. (M.) carbonis sp. n. and other details are specified in Discussion of M. (M.) carbonis sp. n. It should be emphasized that the inner gonostylus of M. (M.) nigrescens is pale, not darkly pigmented as illustrated by Lackschewitz (1940a, Figs 10 a–b). Distribution. Spain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.041 | 0.022 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".