Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genus Eopachylosticta Malaise, 1945 Eopachylosticta Malaise, 1945, p. 14. Type species. Amasis byrami Cockerell, 1925. Emended diagnosis. Because of lack of sufficiently preserved wings and incompletely preserved body, the type and only fossil lacks many characters reliably used as diagnostic in Cimbicidae. However, generic distinction in Pachylostictinae is currently based in part on colour pattern (Vilhelmsen et al. 2019) which is available here, allowing at least a tentative genus diagnosis until better preserved fossils are found. The genus is distinct from others of Pachylostictinae by its dark head and thorax in contrast to its distinctly paler (somewhat infuscate) abdomen. Remarks. Eopachylosticta belongs to the Pachylostictinae by a combination of its antennae with five segments and the median longitudinal mesonotal sulcus and notauli present and well developed (Vilhelmsen 2019). Preservation of the type specimen of Eopachylosticta byrami suffers from the aggressive hydrochemistry of the Green River depositional environment. This is a common problem for fossil insects in parts of this formation, where the wings, legs and other body parts which were pale in life may become extremely faint or invisible as fossils. Therefore, our description and interpretation of this fossil is limited to distinguishing the genus from others of Pachylostictinae, setting aside more detailed analysis until better preserved material is available. Species included. Type species only.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.041 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".