MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931682544 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7488467

Ekspresowa Analiza Zagrożenia Agrofagiem: Coniferiporia weirii (Murrill) L.W. Zhou & Y.C. Dai (2016)

2017· report· en· W6931682544 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2017
Typereport
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInnovation and Socioeconomic Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhytosanitary certificationQuarantineFungusHost (biology)Pathogen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<em>Coniferiporia weirii</em> is a pathogen that causes yellow ring rot of coniferous roots. The main host is green Douglas fir, the most abundant in Pomerania region, but making up a small percentage of the stand. The fungus is a quarantine organism, it is on the EPPO A1 list, its introduction and spread in the EU is prohibited. It naturally spreads slowly. The most likely means of entry is the transport of infected raw material in the form of plant cuttings (not seeds), untreated wood, logs and bark. Detection of the pathogen in the first few years is difficult, especially in large trees, as symptoms are not readily apparent.<br> <em>C. weirii</em> naturally occurs in the United States, Canada, Japan and China. Due to the similarity between the climatic conditions of the Polish area and the regions where the pathogen occurs, the fungus can also occur in the PRA area and cause economic losses.<br> Probability of entry: low<br> Probability of establishment: high<br> Probability of spread: low, as the most susceptible hosts are introduced trees, some occurring sparsely in the Polish area or in single plantings. The fungus can probably infect many other conifer species found in the EPPO region. The primary phytosanitary measure is to control plant material and wood imported from the area where the pathogen is common. If the occurrence of the species is recorded in Poland, it is necessary to develop and incorporate procedures for dealing with <em>C. weirii</em>.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.367
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.000
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0550.058

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicInnovation and Socioeconomic DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207