Tuckingmill, Camborne, Cornwall: Historic Building Recording (Level 2)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As specified in the WSI (CA 2017), the building recording survey was to cover Buildings 19-30 on Fig. 10 of the previous archaeological assessment (Cornwall Council 2010). However, it was not possible to survey some of these buildings: " Buildings 25, 26, 28 and 29 had already been demolished; " Buildings 22 and 23a were not seen due to thick vegetation, though it is believed that little of these buildings survives. In June and July 2017, Cotswold Archaeology carried out a historic building recording survey at Tuckingmill, Camborne, Cornwall. The recorded buildings originally formed part of the Bickford Smith's Fuseworks. The 19th century 'V Building' and the early 20th century 'North Lights Building' are the earliest buildings on the site. They are key elements of the Tuckingmill & Roskear Conservation Area, as well as forming part of the Cornwall and West Devon Mining Landscape World Heritage Site. The remaining buildings included in the building recording survey are more recent constructions of lower historical importance, and can mainly be characterised as ancillary buildings. All of the buildings have undergone significant deterioration since the mid-1990s. Nearly half of the original buildings on site having been demolished or having disappeared from view, while the remaining buildings having been damaged by fire, vandalism and overgrown vegetation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.250 | 0.074 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".