Goodwill House - Integrated Project Dossier (2014)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The building at 312 Laurier Avenue is located at the corner of Laurier Avenue East and Russell Avenue, in the city of Ottawa. This two-and-a-half storey house is designated as a provincial heritage building under the Ontario Heritage Act, for its architectural and historical values. The home is recognized for its large scale and elegant design, representing such architectural styles as Edwardian Classical. The house features a perfectly symmetrical plan, a hipped roof, a centred dormer, a tall chimney, a porch supported by classically inspired columns. Further features include a generous amount of windows, bevelled leaded glass windows, robustly modelled rich surface decoration, rich interior decoration of fine woodwork, coloured finishing stone. The house is historically valuable due to its associated with George Goodwin, a building contractor, gaining most of his wealth has come from railway contracts. His company was responsible for the construction of the house which was underway by the spring of 1899 and completed by 1900. George and his family lived in the house for about 10 years before moving to a new residence at 184 Lisgar Street. The house went through numerous ownerships including the McLachlin family, one of Ottawa’s first lumbermen, the Grey Sisters of the Immaculate Conception, a Barracks for the Canadian Women’s Army Corps and St John Ambulance Canadian Headquarters, before reaching its current use by Amnesty International.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.347 | 0.141 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".