MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931845563 · doi:10.5683/sp3/nozwxz

Rapid Assessment of the Temporal Function and Phenotypic Reversibility of Neurodevelopmental Disorder Risk Genes in C. elegans

2022· dataset· en· W6931845563 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2022
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Dysraphism and Malformations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhenotypeGeneNeurodevelopmental disorderFunction (biology)Loss functionCaenorhabditis elegans

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>Raw and processed data for “Rapid Assessment of the Temporal Function and Phenotypic Reversibility of Neurodevelopmental Disorder Risk Genes in C. elegans”</p> <ul> <li>Preprint (BioRxiv): <a href="https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.21.465355" class="uri">https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.21.465355</a></li> <li>Analysis source code repository (Github): <a href="https://github.com/troymcdiarmid/reversibility/" class="uri">https://github.com/troymcdiarmid/reversibility/</a></li> </ul> <h4 id="abstract">Abstract:</h4> <p>Hundreds of genes have been implicated in neurodevelopmental disorders. Previous studies have indicated that some phenotypes caused by decreased developmental function of select risk genes can be reversed by restoring gene function in adulthood. However, very few risk genes have been assessed for adult reversibility. We developed a strategy to rapidly assess the temporal requirements and phenotypic reversibility of neurodevelopmental disorder risk gene orthologs using a conditional protein degradation system and machine vision phenotypic profiling in Caenorhabditis elegans. Using this approach, we measured the effects of degrading and re- expressing orthologs of 3 neurodevelopmental risk genes EBF3, BRN3A, and DYNC1H1 across 30 morphological, locomotor, sensory, and learning phenotypes at multiple timepoints throughout development. We found some degree of phenotypic reversibility was possible for each gene studied. However, the temporal requirements of gene function and degree of phenotypic reversibility varied by gene and phenotype. The data reflects the dynamic nature of gene function and the importance of using multiple time windows of degradation and re-expression to understand the many roles a gene can play over developmental time. This work also demonstrates a strategy of using a high-throughput model system to investigate temporal requirements of gene function across a large number of phenotypes to rapidly prioritize neurodevelopmental disorder genes for re-expression studies in other organisms.</p> <p>Further details about this project, including a web version README.md file included here and the R code necessary to regenerate all of the figures and formal analyses in the manuscript using the data in this repository can be found at: https://github.com/troymcdiarmid/reversibility The R packages required for this project are listed at the beginning of each markdown at the github repository. The code in each markdown is used to analyze the data from one gene (several experiments per gene). See the bioRxiv for further details about the project.</p> <p>The “Reversibility” folder includes all of the raw and processed Multi-Worm Tracker (https://sourceforge.net/projects/mwt/) output files. The files are organized to have one folder per gene, each with several experiments per gene. Each experiment consists of multiple raw Multi-Worm-Tracker output files pertaining to each individual plate of worms that was tracker (these are the time stamped files). The organized morphology summary (data.smorph) and reversal feature summaries (data.srev) are also included in case the user does not want to regenerate them using the code at the associated github (link included above). (2022-03-15)</p> <p>For questions or comments specific to this repository, please contact:</p> <p>Troy A. McDiarmid - GitHub - <span class="citation" data-cites="Troy_McD_UBC">@Troy_McD_UBC</span></p> <p>Additional questions about the project, such as further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the Lead Contact, Catharine H. Rankin (crankin@psych.ubc.ca).</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.458
Threshold uncertainty score0.973

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealisSame topicSpinal Dysraphism and MalformationsFrench-language works237,207