MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6931889951 · doi:10.5683/sp2/k7odsg

Fourth Avenue Baptist Church - Integrated Project Dossier (2014)

2020· dataset· en· W6931889951 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2020
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChoirWorshipFront (military)Neighbourhood (mathematics)Local churchElement (criminal law)Holy See

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Fourth Avenue Baptist Church is one of the numerous historic buildings scattered across the Glebe. Rising above Ottawa’s Glebe neighbourhood with its large stone and red brick building, the church represents an excellent example of the High Victorian Gothic Revival style. The distinguishing features of the building are the pointed openings, the buttresses, the windows in groups of three and the pitched roof. The Fourth Avenue Baptist Church features the main characteristics of a Baptist church. The largest and most important part of the building is the sanctuary. Other important rooms include Sunday school rooms, a hall or function room and kitchen for social gathering, offices and vestries for staff. Like all community buildings, the church has also foyers and restrooms. As was previously said the sanctuary is the most important element of the church. The teaching and preaching of the Bible take a central role in Baptist worship. As such, a central aspect of the sanctuary is the pulpit. It is the place in front of the sloping sanctuary, raised on a platform so it is visible to the entire congregation. Music plays a large part in Baptist worship as well. Being a traditional Baptist church, the Fourth Avenue Church has a choir with the seating area on a platform, behind the pulpit. The church also has an organ. The console is placed in front of the sitting area of the choir and pipes are mounted on the wall behind the choir. In 1996, the music program was further enhanced by the purchase of a Kawi grand piano and a state of the art sound system. The pews face the pulpit and have a semi-circular layout, encouraging the sense of community and participation. --- The present Integrated Project Dossier (IPD) was prepared in the context of an Undergraduate course - ARCH4100/CIVE3207 Historic Building Recording and Assessment offered by Carleton University. The main purpose of the IPD is to provide students with the opportunity of learning various approaches, techniques and conventions employed in the field of historic site recording. Generally, a survey is completed using multiple techniques and tools. The data provided by each technique is integrated to obtain a complete survey. Among the most employed techniques that can be encountered are hand surveying, total station surveying, photography, photogrammetry and laser scanning. Also, completion of the dossier provides students with the opportunity to become accustomed with the electronic devices currently used for performing complex tasks such as recording and assessment of buildings. The task is carried out by a group of five students from Carleton University.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.173
Threshold uncertainty score0.580

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1730.050

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealis→French-language works237,207→