Antennella quadriaurita Ritchie 1909
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Antennella quadriaurita Ritchie, 1909 (fig. 4 S) Antennella quadriaurita Ritchie, 1909: 92, fig. 9. – Schuchert, 1997: 29, fig. 9. – Vervoort & Watson, 2003: 344, fig. 83F–I. Material examined. Stn. I10, 28.xi.2007: numerous sterile stems, up to 9 mm high, on sponge (NHM 2009.24). Remarks. The ahydrothecate segments in the present material are short and carry generally a single nematotheca, more rarely two. Following Millard (1977b), their length may vary considerably in correlation with the number of nematothecae they bear. Ritchie (1909) described 2–4 nematothecae in his type material, 3 being the most frequent number, while 1–4 are generally found upon inspection of numerous samples (Schuchert 1997). The first pair of lateral nematothecae reaches slightly beyond the hydrothecal margin; the upper chamber is shallow, ca. 3–4 times shorter than the basal one; its adaxial wall is lowered, without cusp. An important variation in the number and shape of the lateral nematothecae, as well as in the structure of the gonothecae was reported by Schuchert (1997), who did not exclude the involvement of a complex of species. Distribution. The type material of this species was trawled (depth 183 m) by the S.Y. Scotia at Gough Island (Ritchie 1909). Additional records are from the tropical West Africa, Vema Seamount, South Africa, India, New Zealand, Japan, and Korea (Vervoort & Watson 2003).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".