MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6932130978 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6136108

Bristolia colberti Gapp & Lieberman, 2014, sp. nov.

2014· article· en· W6932130978 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtist diversity and phylogeny
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPosterior segment of eyeballMerge (version control)Regular polygonTransverse planeLobe

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bristolia colberti sp. nov. Fig. 2.4 Type material. Holotype KUMIP 355552. Paratypes KUMIP 355553 and PWNHC 2013.23.35–37. Etymology. In honour of actor and comedian Stephen T. Colbert. Diagnosis. Width of interocular area approximately 0.5 times the width (tr.) of ocular lobe; L2 and L3 do not merge abaxially; prominent ocular furrow; width of the ocular lobe is equal to the width of the extraocular area abaxial to L2. Description. Anterior cephalic border directly anterior of ocular lobes directed posteriorly 5-10 degrees, length (sag.) approximately 0.6 times length LO; anterior border furrow present; LA contacts anterior border furrow; length (sag.) of LA is approximately the combined length (sag.) of LO, LI, and L2; posterior half of LA constricts to width 0.6 times that of widest part of LA; furrow present where ocular lobes contact LA; ocular furrow present; ocular lobes wide, maximum width approximately equals width (tr.) extraocular area, extending posteriorly to L1; width of interocular area measured opposite L1 approximately 0.5 times the width (tr.) of ocular lobe; S3 convex anteriorly, conjoined adaxially; abaxial margins of L3 extend further adaxially than L2; L2 and L3 do not merge abaxially; S2 convex anteriorly, conjoined adaxially; L1 straight, not conjoined adaxially; abaxial margins of L1 directly anterior of LO; SO slightly convex posteriorly, not conjoined adaxially; posterior border of LO slightly convex posteriorly; posterior border between LO and intergenal angle straight, parallel to a transverse line; posterior border between genal angle and intergenal angle is deflected anteriorly approximately 70 degrees at intergenal angle; intergenal angle developed midway between genal angle and ocular lobe; intergenal swelling present; genal angle developed adaxial of anterior margin of ocular lobe; genal spines deflected posteriorly at approximately 45 degrees with an average width equal to the length (sag.) of LO. Discussion. This species is assigned to the genus Bristolia based on a number of characters that it shares with other species within the genus. These include: a short (sag.) anterior cephalic border, prominently separated from the extraocular area by a furrow; the frontal lobe contacts the anterior border furrow; the ocular lobe contacts LA at the postero-lateral border; faint depression across entire region where ocular lobe hits frontal lobe (present in most Bristolia except for B. anteros Palmer in Palmer & Halley, 1979 and B. sp. [Fritz 1972]); S3 is the same depth laterally as adaxially; lateral margins of L2 are constricted compared to the rest of the glabella; posterior edge of ocular lobe opposite adaxial part of margin of L1; long genal spines are present; a faint intergenal ridge is observed; extraocular area is flattened; and as with other species of Bristolia, this specimen has a prominent intergenal angle flexing anteriorly and genal spines that are positioned far anteriorly on the cephalon. Unlike other species of Bristolia, this species has a prominent ocular furrow. Also the ratio of the width (sag.) of L3 to L2 is greater than in other species and the lateral furrows of LO and L1 are not as constricted anteriorly. Lastly, the width of the ocular lobe (measured perpendicular to the lobe axis at its midpoint) is equal to the width of the extraocular area abaxial to L2, whereas other species have narrower ocular lobes and wider ocular areas (sag.). This species generally resembles the poorly preserved (known from a partial cephalon) Laudonia? sp. 1 Fritz, 1972, p. 27, pl. 9, fig. 21, treated as Bristolia sp. in Lieberman 1999, and also from the Sekwi Formation. For instance, they both have a prominent intergenal angle flexing anteriorly and genal spines that are positioned far anteriorly on the cephalon. However, they do differ in several features as well, primarily involving the shape and position of the ocular lobes, and are thus treated as distinct. In particular, in B. colberti: the posterior tips of the ocular lobes extend back to LO instead of L1; a line from the anterior to the posterior tips of the ocular lobe parallels a sagittal line, instead of forming a 20-30 degree angle relative to a sagittal line; and the interocular area and LA are less prominently inflated. In southwestern Laurentia, species of Bristolia typically occur high up in the Dyeran stage (Webster 2011a, 2011b; Webster et al. 2011). However, in northwestern Laurentia this genus occurs relatively lower down in the stage, especially relative to the position of other olenelloid genera. Occurrence. Olenellus zone or Waucoban Series, Dyeran stage, sensu Webster (2011a, b) and Webster et al. (2011), early Cambrian, Sekwi Formation, Mackenzie Mountains, Northwest Territories, Canada, Section 4, 430– 435 m above the base of section.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.113

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicProtist diversity and phylogenyFrench-language works237,207