MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6939452070 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.25378691

Summer recreational boating impacts on erosion, turbidity, and phosphorus levels in Canadian freshwater lakes

2024· article· en· W6939452070 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCoastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTurbiditySedimentShoreErosionPhosphorusHydrology (agriculture)Water qualityLittoral zoneCoastal erosion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Increases in boat traffic over time can present a risk to the integrity of aquatic ecosystems. In addition to severe environmental degradation or boat-related disturbances, boat wave’s kinetic energy can induce a cumulative impact on freshwater ecosystems. However, seldom data report the impacts of boat waves on shoreline erosion and physico-chemical properties on freshwater lakes. In this study, we monitored shoreline erosion, turbidity, and total phosphorus levels. Wave-induced shoreline erosion was measured through shoreline rebar pin excavation across five lakes in southern Quebec. Sediment resuspension was measured through turbidity sampling in Lake Massawippi over three years. Total phosphorus was also monitored for potential impacts of sediment resuspension. Our study did not detect significant shoreline erosion. However, water turbidity was positively correlated with boat traffic and wind speed and negatively with the littoral slope angle. Moreover, water total phosphorus levels were positively correlated with turbidity. Thus, despite a lack of detectible impact on the shoreline, our results suggest that boat waves can have an impact on freshwater lakes with an increase in sediment resuspension and phosphorus availability. Management agencies could therefore benefit in the long-term from implementing or reinforcing policies aiming to minimize the impact of boats on sediment resuspension. L’accroissement du trafic nautique représente un risque pour l‘intégrité des écosystèmes aquatiques. Parmi différentes perturbations possibles se trouve l’impact cumulatif de l’énergie cinétique des vagues sur le littoral, notamment via l‘érosion des rives et la remise en suspension des sédiments qui peut modifier la physico-chimie des lacs d’eau douce. La présente étude pallie au manque de données sur le sujet en mesurant l‘érosion des rives, la turbidité et le phosphore total dans des lacs sujets au nautisme récréatif. L'érosion a été mesurée dans cinq lacs du sud du Québec par l’excavation de tiges de métal partiellement enfouies. La remise en suspension des sédiments a été évaluée dans le lac Massawippi, sur trois ans, par la mesure de la turbidité en eau peu profonde. Le phosphore total de l’eau a été analysé en parallèle pour identifier des impacts potentiels de la remise en suspension. Aucune érosion des rives n’a été mesurée. En revanche, la turbidité s’est avérée corrélée positivement au trafic et à la vitesse du vent et inversement corrélée à la pente du littoral. Aussi, le phosphore total était positivement corrélé à la turbidité. Ainsi, malgré l’absence d’impact détectable sur les berges, les vagues de bateaux semblent induire la remise en suspension des sédiments et augmenter la disponibilité en phosphore dans les lacs d’eau douce. Les gestionnaires du territoire pourraient donc bénéficier à long terme de la mise en œuvre ou du renforcement de politiques visant à minimiser l'impact des bateaux sur la remise en suspension des sédiments. No evidence was found that summer boating causes significant erosion on freshwater lake shorelines. Rather, boating seems to resuspend sediments in shallow areas, increasing turbidity and total phosphorus levels. These results were obtained in lakes with shoreline speed limit buffers (100 m and 10 km h−1).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.103

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicCoastal wetland ecosystem dynamicsFrench-language works237,207