Additional file 1 of The meaning of ubiquitylation of the DSL ligand Delta for the development of Drosophila
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Additional file 1: Fig. S1. Expression of DlattP-constructs in various tissues compared to Dl::GFP. (A-A’’, C-C’’, F-F’’, H-H’’) Expression in various imaginal discs of the late third instar stage. (A-A’’, F-F’’) Expression in the eye imaginal disc. (C-C’’, H-H’’) Expression in the haltere, wing and leg disc.(B-B’’, G-G’’) Expression in the larval brain of the late third instar stage. The arrowhead highlights expression in the optic lobes. (D-D’’, I-I’’) Expression in stage 11 embryos. (E-E’’, J-J’’) Expression in the adult gut. Expression is largely restricted to escargot (esg-GFP) positive ISCs (E’’, J’’). Fig. S2. (A-B’’) Comparison of expression of DlattP-Dl-HA and DlattP-DlK2R-HA on the cell surface. Clonal analysis was used to twin clone that express either of the DlattP-variants in homozygosity, as described in (A). (B, B’) An example of a disc bearing the clones. The arrowhead points to a Dl-HA homozygous clone. The abundance of Dl is much reduced in the cells of Dl-HA homozygous in comparison to cells of DlK2R homozygous or heterozygous clones. (B’’) Pixel density measurements of the channels in the apical membrane region highlighted by the thin line in (B, B’). It revealed that Dl-HA is significantly less abundant than DlK2R-HA in the membrane. (C-C’’’) Co-depletion of Rab4 and Rab11 by expression of RNAi constructs for 46h using a combination of ciGal4 and tubGal80ts. It efficiently suppresses the expression of a mCherry-Rab4 construct (C’), as well as Rab11 (C’’). (D, D’) Co-depletion of Rab4 and Rab11 had no effect on the expression of DlK2R-HA, suggesting that endosomal recycling is not involved in the increase of it abundance in the membrane. Fig. S3. Three additional examples of wing discs with twin clones homozygous for DlattP-DlK2R-HA or DlattP-Dl-HA crossing the region of stripe2 at different points. Fig. S4. (A-C’’’) Analysis of SOP formation in DlattP-DlK2R-HA/Df (B-B’’’) and DlattP-Dl-HA/Df (C-C’’’) wing discs. (A-A’’’) The expression of the used marker in the wildtype is shown for comparison. (B-C’’’) No significant differences in the expression of the markers are detected, indicating that the SOP selection occurs normally in DlattP-DlK2R-HA/Df flies. (D, E) Depletion of neur function by neur-RNAi with ciGal4 in DlattP-DlK2R-HA/Df flies causes the development of a neurogenic phenotype (arrow). (F) Homozygous DlattP-Dl-NEQN2A-HA flies die during embryogenesis and display the neurogenic cuticle phenotype. The arrow point to the small patch of remaining cuticle. (G-G’’) Notal region of a wing disc bearing DlattP-Dl-NEQN2A-HA homozygous clones. The clones are labelled by the loss of GFP. (G’, G’’) magnification of the region highlighted by the arrows in (G). It reveals the neurogenic phenotype and the accumulation of DlattP-Dl-NEQN2A-HA in the plasma membrane of the SOPs (arrow). This accumulation is much less obvious in the SOP developing in the heterozygous DlattP-Dl-NEQN2A-HA/+ region (G, G’, arrowhead).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.055 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".