MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Interstitial lung abnormalities and interstitial lung diseases associated with cigarette smoking in a rural cohort undergoing surgical resection

2022· other· en· W6939900877 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLungCohortCOPDInterstitial lung diseaseDLCOFibrosisPulmonary fibrosisHoneycombingUsual interstitial pneumoniaPneumomediastinum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Cigarette smoking is a risk factor for interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) and interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). Investigation defining the relationships between ILAs/ILDs and clinical, radiographic, and pathologic findings in smokers have been incomplete. Employing a cohort undergoing surgical resection for lung nodules/masses, we (1) define the prevalence of ILAs/ILDs, (2) delineate their clinical, radiographic and pathologic predictors, and (3) determine their associations with mortality. Methods Patients undergoing resection of lung nodules/masses between 2017 and 2020 at a rural Appalachian, tertiary medical center were retrospectively investigated. Predictors for ILAs/ILDs and mortality were assessed using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results In the total study cohort of 352 patients, radiographic ILAs and ILDs were observed in 35.2% and 17.6%, respectively. Among ILA patterns, subpleural reticular changes (14.8%), non-emphysematous cysts, centrilobular (CL) ground glass opacities (GGOs) (8% each), and mixed CL-GGO and subpleural reticular changes (7.4%) were common. ILD patterns included combined pulmonary fibrosis emphysema (CPFE) (3.1%), respiratory bronchiolitis (RB)-ILD (3.1%), organizing pneumonitis (2.8%) and unclassifiable (4.8%). The group with radiographic ILAs/ILDs had a significantly higher proportion of ever smokers (49% vs. 39.9%), pack years of smoking (44.57 ± 36.21 vs. 34.96 ± 26.22), clinical comorbidities of COPD (35% vs. 26.5%) and mildly reduced diffusion capacity (% predicated 66.29 ± 20.55 vs. 71.84 ± 23). Radiographic centrilobular and paraseptal emphysema (40% vs. 22.2% and 17.6% vs. 9.6%, respectively) and isolated traction bronchiectasis (10.2% vs. 4.2%) were associated with ILAs/ILDs. Pathological variables of emphysema (34.9% vs. 18.5%), any fibrosis (15.9% vs. 4.6%), peribronchiolar metaplasia (PBM, 8% vs. 1.1%), RB (10.3% vs. 2.5%), and anthracosis (21.6% vs. 14.5%) were associated with ILAs/ILDs. Histologic emphysema showed positive correlations with any fibrosis, RB, anthracosis and ≥ 30 pack year of smoking. The group with ILAs/ILDs had significantly higher mortality (9.1% vs. 2.2%, OR 4.13, [95% CI of 1.84–9.25]). Conclusions In a rural cohort undergoing surgical resection, radiographic subclinical ILAs/ILDs patterns were highly prevalent and associated with ever smoking and intensity of smoking. The presence of radiographic ILA/ILD patterns and isolated honeycomb changes were associated with increased mortality. Subclinical ILAs/ILDs and histologic fibrosis correlated with clinical COPD as well as radiographic and pathologic emphysema emphasizing the co-existence of these pulmonary injuries in a heavily smoking population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshare→Same topicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions→French-language works237,207→