MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6939922839 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4052768

Warping an atlas derived from serial histology to 5 high-resolution MRIs

2018· other· en· W6939922839 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2018
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThalamusAtlas (anatomy)Globus pallidusRight hemisphereCerebral hemisphereWestern hemisphereLateralization of brain function

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The following collection consists of: 5 T1-weighted MR images (brain1-5), and an average of the 5 T1w images (model); 6 Surface-based representations of the left and right striatum, globus palidus and thalamus (obj); 6 atlases of the striatum, globus pallidus and thalamus for the 5 T1w and the model image; 5 full atlas label files (108 subcortical structures); 10 pseudo-MRIs for the 5 subjects (left and right hemisphere separate); 10 concatenated transforms registering the histologically-derived atlas to each T1w (left and right hemisphere separate) (xfm); 2 histologically-derived atlases with 108 subcortical structures delineated (left and right hemisphere separate); 2 histologically-derived atlases with the striatum, globus pallidus, and thalamus delineated (left and right hemisphere separate) (mask); 2 pseudo-MRIs of the histological segmentation (left and right hemisphere separate); 2 scripts for the nonlinear registation code to generate the full atlases (ANIMAL_script.sh) and final atlases of the striatum, globus pallidus, and thalamus (mask_script.sh). All MRIs, atlases and pseudo-MRIs are available in both MINC (http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/ServicesSoftware/HomePage) and NIfTI (https://nifti.nimh.nih.gov/) format.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.101

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareFrench-language works237,207