MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6940245085 · doi:10.60928/fj0r-o3zl

CMOS Image Sensor Architecture for Primal-Dual Coding

2024· article· en· W6940245085 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueIISS online library · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPixelImage sensorCMOSCoding (social sciences)CMOS sensorDot pitchAmplifier

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A CMOS image sensor architecture for primal-dual coding (PDC), the developed image sensor and the sensing side of the system, as well as preliminary sensor test results are presented in this paper. The architecture proposed in this work uses pixels with the embedded 2-bit latches which are responsible for the pre-loading and storing of the exposure codes. The subsequent exposure code (mask) can therefore be loaded while the current mask is being used for exposure, resulting in a pipelined coding operation which does not interfere with the pixel exposure time. The mask loading is done serially via a vertical metal line (one line per-column), making both the imager architecture and the pixel array scalable towards high pixel resolutions. The sensor is designed using a 0.35µm image sensor optimized CMOS process resulting in the total pixel pitch of 25µm. The pixel includes a photo-gate based photodetector, two 1-bit latches, required logic gates, two charge collection buckets (floating diffusions) and corresponding symmetric readout with two source-followers (one for each bucket), resulting in a pixel fill-factor of 20.5%. Every pixel column features a programmable gain amplifier whose outputs are time-multiplexed over 3 analog output pads. Analog-to-digital conversion is performed off-chip by 3 16-bit ADCs. The 60x80 pixel imager consumes 7mW of power while operating at 25 fps. The sensor measurement results show that the loading of the complete PDC mask for the whole array can be performed in 30µs, resulting in a large number of masks that can be applied during a single exposure time, therefore creating a very promising platform for an effective and optimal use of PDC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.266
Threshold uncertainty score0.804

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIISS online librarySame topicCCD and CMOS Imaging SensorsFrench-language works237,207