MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6940682815 · doi:10.11575/prism/30091

Electronic Waste Management in Canada

2013· other· en· W6940682815 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2013
Typeother
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHazardous wasteElectronic wasteProduction (economics)Consumption (sociology)Natural resourceProduct (mathematics)Cleaner productionHuman healthExtended producer responsibility

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Waste management is becoming a major global policy issue for several reasons including pollution control, the increasing demand for the extraction of rare and finite natural resources required for consumer and industrial product and the diminishing availability of landfill sites for disposal. Improper waste management and landfill use have implications for policy development regarding environmental degradation and human health issues. Of particular note is the increasing production and consumption of consumer electronic products, such as laptops, televisions and mobile phones, which are composed of rare and precious metals, other metals, plastics, minerals and chemicals. Many of these substances are toxic when inadequately disposed of or dismantled and they pose significant risks to human health and well-­‐being as well as environmental damage through contamination of air, soil and groundwater sources. In addition, the improper disposal of end-­‐of-­‐life electronics and their components represents a significant resource loss. Improperly managing electronic waste is a global as well as a Canadian issue. A worldwide phenomenon of exporting electronic waste (e-­‐waste) from the developed to developing world, often illegally and without adequate regulation, has been recognized over the past couple decades. The international community has stepped in to alleviate this ethical problem by prohibiting the export of hazardous waste from OECD to non-­‐OECD countries. However, this international action has done little to encourage effective domestic waste management in Canada. Instead, provinces have taken initiatives at different levels, leading to misaligned policies at the national level. This purpose in this paper is to investigate Canada’s initiatives in terms of e-­‐waste management and whether a more domestically focused strategy would be more effective in improving Canada’s landfill use, general waste management and environmental performance, as well as further deterring the illegal export of e-­‐waste.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.124
Threshold uncertainty score0.897

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0090.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant InteractionsFrench-language works237,207