MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6940941814 · doi:10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.2288

Assessment of addictive behavior in patients with schizophrenia

2023· article· en· W6940941814 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed Central · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)AddictionCannabisQuarter (Canadian coin)Retrospective cohort study

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Schizophrenia, a chronic and complex psychiatric pathology, can be isolated. However, it may have other comorbidities and thus be accompanied by addictive behaviors complicating their management. OBJECTIVES: to estimate the prevalence and identify the characteristics of addictive behavior among patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: A retrospective study of 151 patients with schizophrenia and hospitalized in the psychiatry department of the Taher Sfar university hospital in Mahdia from January 2017 to December 2021. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 39.8 ± 11.23 years with a predominance of age group 36-45 years (38.4%). All of the patients were males . Three quarters of patients (75.5%) were users of psychoactive substances (PSA): nearly three quarters (72.8%) dependent on tobacco, more than a third (39.7%) dependent on alcohol, more a quarter (29.1%) dependent on cannabis and almost a quarter (26.5%) dependent on other SPA. In more than half of the cases (54.4%), the age at which SPA consumption began was between 16 and 25. SPA use preceded the onset of schizophrenia in 62.3% of case. The relationship with the entourage was marked by hetero-aggressiveness in 77.5% of the patients, a withdrawal from the entourage for 16.6% of the patients and a conflict for 5.3% of the patients. The impact on the relationship with oneself was marked by self-aggressiveness in 18.5% of patients. Regarding professional impact, three quarters of patients (76.1%) had to stop working. The majority of patients (84.1%) continued their usual treatment, while 15.2% of patients stopped it. In only one patient increased doses were necessary. CONCLUSIONS: Subjects suffering from schizophrenia are particularly vulnerable to addictions, mainly to tobacco and alcohol. They are therefore a group at greater risk of harmful effects of psychoactive substances and at worsening the clinical course of their psychiatric illness. Screening and treatment measures their addictive behaviors early on, even before schizophrenia sets in, should be offered. DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST: None Declared

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed CentralSame topicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant InteractionsFrench-language works237,207