Spirometric Findings among School-Aged First Nations Children on a Reserve: A Pilot Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are increasing concerns for First Nations peoples in Canada. Although hospital utilization for asthma and COPD among First Nations peoples has been increasing, the prevalence of asthma or wheezing is comparable to national averages.OBJECTIVES: A pilot study was conducted to determine the prevalence of impaired lung function in school-aged First Nations children.PATIENTS AND METHODS: A First Nations community in northern Alberta was selected to participate. Consent forms and a school health survey were completed by parents or guardians. Children with consent completed spirometry at school, and results were compared with predicted values.RESULTS: A total of 36 children participated (response rate 70.6%). Of these, 19.4% of parents reported that their child had received a physician diagnosis of asthma at some point in their life; only 28.6% had a parental report of still having asthma. Parents smoked in 73.1% of the children's homes. The mean (± SD) percentage of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) over forced vital capacity (FVC) was 82.6%±6.9% (94.4%±0.08% of predicted). Evidence of airflow obstruction was found in 25% of the children. Parental report of the child ever having asthma was associated with impaired lung function (OR 3.20; P=0.033). Children in a home with reported mold exposure were less likely to have impaired lung function (OR 0.68; P=0.030).CONCLUSIONS: Many children in this study already have established airflow obstruction and may be at increased risk for asthma or COPD. Exposure to mold appeared to be protective. Further research is needed to evaluate the lung health concerns of this population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.038 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".